Abstract:Objective: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) cannot be prevented after full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD), and the optimal surgical treatment for RLDH after FELD remains controversial. The aim of the study was to suggest a surgical strategy for FELD to treat RLDH following a previous FELD and to present surgical outcomes. Methods: Between February 2015 and March 2022, 68 patients with RLDH were surgically treated with FELD retrospectively. An original approach was suggested for the treatment of early recurrence (24 h-2 weeks). The full endoscopic transforaminal technique (FETD) was considered for patients requiring local anesthesia, and in RLDH with FETD indications or FEID technological difficulties. The full endoscopic interlaminar technique (FEID) was chosen in RLDH with FEID indications. Both FEID and FETD were suitable if no FEID or FETD technological difficulties existed. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. Postoperative follow-up data at 24 h, 3 months, and final-follow-up were recorded. Operation time and clinical outcomes were assessed with t test. p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: All 68 patients had an average follow-up time of 23.8 months (range, 6-76 months). In the 13 cases of early recurrence, the operation time (32.30 ± 9.67 vs. 58.00 ± 6.16 min) in the original surgical approach group was shorter than that in the changing surgical approach group (p < 0.05). In the 28 cases of L4/5 FETD recurrence (>2 weeks), the operation time (66.17 ± 12.18 vs. 53.60 ± 5.45 min) in the FETD group was more than that in the FEID group (p < 0.05). In the 22 cases of L5S1 recurrence (>2 weeks), the operation time (55.75 ± 8.79 vs. 79.33 ± 6.65 min) in the FEID group was shorter than in the FETD group (p < 0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores at 24 h, 3 months, and final-follow up were all significantly improved, compared with their preoperative counterparts (p < 0.05). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, 88.23% of patients showed excellent or good results. Re-recurrence occurred in three patients at 3 months. No surgical complications were observed in any of the 68 cases. Conclusion: FELD is a safe and effective treatment option for RLDH with previous FELD. For early recurrence, the original approach was suggested. Both FEID and FETD were effective and safe for recurrence (>2 weeks), but FEID seemed more efficient for L4/5 RLDH after previous FETD and for L5S1 RLDH.

Association of spinal–pelvic parameters with recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after endoscopic surgery: a retrospective case–control study

Relationship of Endplate Changes and Low Back Pain after Discectomy

Radiological risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective matched case-control study

Changes in the Flexion-Relaxation Response after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Patients with Disc Herniation

Risk Factors for Recurrent Herniation after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Analysis of risk factors for post-operative recurrence after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis

Prognostic factors for residual symptoms following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Investigating the impact of cartilaginous endplate herniation on recovery from percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Factors related to the postoperative recurrence of lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy: A meta-analysis

Surgical Strategy and Outcomes of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation Following a Previous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Regression of lumbar disc herniation with non-surgical treatment: a case report

The Importance of Spinopelvic Parameters in Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation

Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for the Treatment of Disc Herniation: A 3-Year Retrospective Study

Efficacy of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disc Herniation With Positive Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign: a Retrospective Case-Control Study

Recurrent disc herniation following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy preferentially occurs when Modic changes are present

Analysis of the clinical efficacy of visualization of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annulus fibrosus suture in lumbar disc herniation

Analysis of the cause of recurrent lumbar disc herniation at the same level and its surgical strategy

Machine Learning Predicts Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for single and double segment lumbar disc herniation with sciatic scoliosis in adults: a retrospective study

C-arm-guided versus ultrasound volumetric navigation-guided percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study

Clinical efficacy of single-channel percutaneous endoscopic nucleotomy with annulus fibrosus suturing for lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study