Abstract:Our work shows how nonlinear responses to environmental gradients drive many of the relationships between plant biodiversity and the biodiversity of above‐ and below‐ground biological communities. This demonstrates how different aspects of biodiversity might respond nonlinearly to changing environments and identifies cases where management‐induced changes in one community could either influence other taxa or lead to loss of apparent biological associations. To predict how biodiversity will respond to global change, it is crucial to understand the relative roles of abiotic drivers and biotic interactions in driving associations between the biodiversity of disparate taxa. It is particularly challenging to understand diversity–diversity links across domains and habitats, because data are rarely available for multiple above‐ and below‐ground taxa across multiple sites. Here, we analyse data from a unique biodiversity data set gathered across a variety of oceanic temperate terrestrial habitats in Wales, comprising 300 sites with co‐located soil microbial, plant, bird and pollinator surveys along with climate and soil physicochemical information. Soil groups are analysed using metabarcoding of the 16S, ITS1 and 18S DNA regions, allowing in‐depth characterisation of microbial and soil animal biodiversity. We explore biodiversity relationships along three aspects of community composition: First, we assess correlation between the alpha diversity of different groups. Second, we assess whether biotic turnover between sites is correlated across different groups. Finally, we investigate the co‐occurrence of individual taxa across sites. In each analysis, we assess the contribution of linear or nonlinear environmental effects. We find that a positive correlation between alpha diversity of plants, soil bacteria, soil fungi, soil heterotrophic protists, bees and butterflies is in fact driven by complex nonlinear responses to abiotic drivers. In contrast, environmental variation did not account for positive associations between the diversity of plants and both birds and AM fungi, suggesting a role for biotic interactions. Both the diversity and taxon‐level associations between the differing soil groups remained even after accounting for nonlinear environmental gradients. Above‐ground, spatial factors played larger roles in driving biotic communities, while linear environmental gradients were sufficient to explain many group‐ and taxon‐level relationships. Synthesis. Our results show how nonlinear responses to environmental gradients drive many of the relationships between plant biodiversity and the biodiversity of above‐ and below‐ground biological communities. Our work shows how different aspects of biodiversity might respond nonlinearly to changing environments and identifies cases where management‐induced changes in one community could either influence other taxa or lead to loss of apparent biological associations.

Divergence in diversity-area relationships between lawn and non-lawn plants in residential landscapes

[Maintaining Mechanism of Species Diversity of Land Plant Communities].

Horticultural availability and homeowner preferences drive plant diversity and composition in urban yards

Bridging beauty and biodiversity: Coupling diversity and aesthetics through optimized plant communities in urban riverfront landscapes

Decoupling Species Richness Variation and Spatial Turnover in Beta Diversity Across a Fragmented Landscape

The effect of urban environments on the diversity of plants in unmanaged grasslands in Los Angeles, United States

The Asymmetric Relationships of the Distribution of Conspecific Saplings and Adults in Forest Fragments

Plant interaction networks reveal the limits of our understanding of diversity maintenance

Landscape context affects patch habitat contributions to biodiversity in agroecosystems

Evolution of Geographical Place and Niche Space: Patterns of Diversification in the North American Sedge (cyperaceae) Flora.

A diversity of diversities: Do complex environmental effects underpin associations between below‐ and above‐ground taxa?

A multidimensional selective landscape drives adaptive divergence between and within closely related Phlox species

Time Is Not Money: Income Is More Important Than Lifestage for Explaining Patterns of Residential Yard Plant Community Structure and Diversity in Baltimore

Diversity and distribution variation of urban spontaneous vegetation with distinct frequencies along river corridors in a fast-growing city

Spatiotemporal Variation of Plant Diversity on Ditch Banks under Different Management Regimes

Regional Effects of Plant Diversity and Biotic Homogenization in Urban Greenspace – the Case of University Campuses Across China

Consistent Stabilizing Effects of Plant Diversity Across Spatial Scales and Climatic Gradients

Environmental heterogeneity modulates the effect of plant diversity on the spatial variability of grassland biomass

[Multi-scale effects of urban landscape pattern on plant diversity in Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China]

Urban Planning and Green Landscape Management Drive Plant Diversity in Five Tropical Cities in China

Neighborhood Diversity Promotes Tree Growth in a Secondary Forest: The Interplay of Intraspecific Competition, Interspecific Competition, and Spatial Scale