Abstract:STUDY QUESTION: What is the inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists when selecting a single Day 5 embryo for transfer?SUMMARY ANSWER: The inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists when selecting a single Day 5 embryo for transfer was generally good, although not optimal, even among experienced embryologists.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous research on the morphological assessment of early stage (two pronuclei to Day 3) embryos has shown varying levels of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. However, single blastocyst transfer is now becoming increasingly popular and there are no published data that assess inter-observer and intra-observer agreement when selecting a single embryo for Day 5 transfer.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective study involving 10 embryologists working at five different IVF clinics within a single organization between July 2013 and November 2015.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The top 10 embryologists were selected based on their yearly Quality Assurance Program scores for blastocyst grading and were asked to morphologically grade all Day 5 embryos and choose a single embryo for transfer in a survey of 100 cases using 2D images. A total of 1000 decisions were therefore assessed. For each case, Day 5 images were shown, followed by a Day 3 and Day 5 image of the same embryo. Subgroup analyses were also performed based on the following characteristics of embryologists: the level of clinical embryology experience in the laboratory; amount of research experience; number of days per week spent grading embryos. The agreement between these embryologists and the one that scored the embryos on the actual day of transfer was also evaluated. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability was assessed using the kappa coefficient to evaluate the extent of agreement.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: This study showed that all 10 embryologists agreed on the embryo chosen for transfer in 50 out of 100 cases. In 93 out of 100 cases, at least 6 out of the 10 embryologists agreed. The inter-observer and intra-observer agreement among embryologists when selecting a single Day 5 embryo for transfer was generally good as assessed by the kappa scores (kappa = 0.734, 95% CI: 0.665-0.791 and 0.759, 95% CI: 0.622-0.833, respectively). The subgroup analyses did not substantially alter the inter-observer and intra-observer agreement among embryologists. The agreement when Day 3 images were included alongside Day 5 images of the same embryos resulted in a change of mind at least three times by each embryologist (on average for <10% of cases) and resulted in a small decrease in inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists (kappa = 0.676, 95% CI: 0.617-0.724 and 0.752, 95% CI: 0.656-808, respectively).The assessment of the inter-observer agreement with regard to morphological grading of Day 5 embryos showed only a fair-to-moderate agreement, which was observed across all subgroup analyses. The highest overall kappa coefficient was seen for the grading of the developmental stage of an embryo (0.513; 95% CI: 0.492-0.538). The findings were similar when the individual embryologists were compared with the embryologist who made the morphological assessments of the available embryos on the actual day of transfer.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: All embryologists had already completed their training and were working under one organization with similar policies between the five clinics. Therefore, the inter-observer agreement might not be as high between embryologists working in clinics with different policies or with different levels of training.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The generally good, although not optimal uniformity between participating embryologists when selecting a Day 5 embryo for transfer, as well as, the surprisingly low agreement when morphologically grading Day 5 embryos could be improved, potentially resulting in increased pregnancy rates. Future studies need to be directed toward technologies that can help achieve this.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None declared.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Day 3 embryo assessment does not provide a reliable prediction for blastocyst formation and designation: a retrospective cohort study

Blastocyst Culture of Human Suboptimal Embryos Does Not Improve Clinical Outcomes

Slow Freezing Should Not Be Totally Substituted by Vitrification when Applied to Day 3 Embryo Cryopreservation: an Analysis of 5613 Frozen Cycles

Cleavage Pattern Predicts Developmental Potential of Day 3 Human Embryos Produced by IVF.

Reconsidering Day 3 Embryo Quality in Planned Freeze-All Blastocyst Cycles

Predictive Value of the Number of Frozen Blastocysts in Live Birth Rates of the Transferred Fresh Embryos

Cell Number on Day 3 of Embryo Development is Associated with Ploidy and Pregnancy Rates

Does Day 3 Embryo Status Matter to Reproductive Outcomes of Single Blastocyst Transfer Cycles? A Cohort Study

Optimizing single blastocyst selection: the role of day 3 embryo morphology in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles

Developmental potential of different embryos on day 3: a retrospective study

Clinical Outcomes for Day 3 Double Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfers Versus Day 5 or 6 Single Blastocyst Transfer in Frozen–thawed Cycles: a Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Analysis of Biochemical and Clinical Pregnancy Loss Between Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer of Blastocysts and Day 3 Cleavage Embryos in Young Women: A Comprehensive Comparison

The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles

Culturing Surplus Poor-Quality Embryos to Blastocyst Stage Have Positive Predictive Value of Clinical Pregnancy Rate.

Analysis of influencing factors for forming class Ⅳ above embryos on Day 3

Fertility and Neonatal Outcomes of Embryos Achieving Blastulation on Day 7: Are They of Clinical Value?

Morphological Evaluation and Grading of Human Embryo Quality from Day - 1 to Day - 3 Embryos for Optimum Conceiving Rate

COMPARABLE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES BETWEEN HIGH-SCORE BLASTOCYSTS WITH LOWER EXPANSION GRADE ON DAY 5 AND HIGHER EXPANSION GRADE ON DAY 6: AN ANALYSIS OF 1751 FROZEN-THAWED CYCLES.

Two types of cleavage, from zygote to three cells, result in different clinical outcomes and should be treated differently

Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study

Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?