Comparison of embryo implantation potential between time-lapse incubators and standard incubators: A randomized controlled study
Xiao-Dong Zhang,Qi Zhang,Wei Han,Wei-Wei Liu,Xiao-Li Shen,Gui-Dong Yao,Sen-Lin Shi,Lin-Li Hu,Shan-Shan Wang,Jun-Xia Wang,Jian-Jun Zhou,Wei-Wei Kang,Chen Luo,Qi Yu,Rui-Zhi Liu,Ying-Pu Sun,Hai-Xiang Sun,Xiao-Hong Wang,Song Quan,Guo-Ning Huang,Heng- De Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.017
IF: 4.567
2022-06-30
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Abstract:Research question : What are the potential clinical benefits of embryo culture and assessment in a time-lapse incubator compares with standard incubators using static assessment? Design : This large multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled study included 1224 participants who were randomly assigned (1:1) to the time-lapse or standard incubator groups. The one or two embryos in all patients were transferred on Day 3. The primary outcome was the implantation rate in the first embryo transfer cycle. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative implantation rate, live birth rate in the first embryo transfer cycle, and cumulative live birth rate. Results : Among 1224 patients recruited, 1182 completed embryo transfer. The number of successfully implanted embryos in the first transfer cycle increased significantly in the time-lapse incubator (time-lapse: 52.4%, standard incubator: 47.1%). The implantation rate in the first embryo transfer cycle in the time-lapse group was still significantly higher than that in the standard incubator group after adjusting for multiple factors (relative risk=1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–1.20, P =0.020). Besides, the cumulative implantation rate, live birth rate in the first embryo transfer cycle, and cumulative live birth rate between the two groups were not statistically different. Conclusions : The implantation rate in the first embryo transfer cycle in the time-lapse group was significantly improved, but the effect of the time-lapse system on the cumulative implantation rate or cumulative live birth rate was not significant. The selection technique offered by TLS rather than an undisturbed environment play an important role in the improvement of IR 1 . These results are only applicable for young patients.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology