Abstract:Fertility and income are negatively related at the aggregate level. However, evidence from recent periods suggests that increasing income leads to higher fertility at the individual level. In this paper, I provide a simple theory that resolves the apparent contradiction. I consider the education and fertility choices of individuals with different learning abilities. Acquiring higher education requires an investment of time and income. As a result, people with higher education have fewer children but, controlling for the level of education, increasing income leads to higher fertility. Rising income and skill premiums motivate more people to pursue higher education, resulting in a negative income-fertility association at the aggregate level. I investigate the explanatory power of the theory in a model calibrated for the US during 1950–2010.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the contradiction between the relationship between income increase and fertility increase at the individual level and the relationship between income increase and fertility decline at the aggregate level. Specifically, the paper proposes a theoretical model to explain why, at the individual level, as income increases, people tend to have more children; while at the aggregate level, as the average income increases, the overall fertility rate of society shows a downward trend.
### Background of the Paper
The paper points out that at the macro - economic level, there is a negative correlation between fertility rate and per - capita income, that is, as per - capita income increases, the fertility rate declines. However, recent research evidence shows that at the individual level, an increase in income actually leads to an increase in fertility rate. This phenomenon seems theoretically contradictory, because if an increase in income for each individual leads to an increase in fertility rate, then why does the overall fertility rate decline as income increases at the macro level?
### Solution
To reconcile this contradiction, the author proposes a model that includes educational choice and fertility decision - making. In this model, people with different abilities need to invest different amounts of time and money costs when pursuing higher education. Therefore, people with a high level of education need more time and money to complete their education, so their opportunity cost of having children is higher, and they tend to have fewer children. However, for those who have already obtained a high level of education, an increase in income will reduce the relative cost of education, thereby releasing more resources for childbearing and consumption, which makes the increase in income positively correlated with the increase in fertility rate within the high - education group.
### Core Assumptions of the Model
1. **Educational Choice**: Individuals decide whether to pursue higher education when they are young, which depends on their learning ability and income level.
2. **Fertility Decision**: Individuals decide the number of children to have after they become adults, which is restricted by their time and income.
3. **Income and Skill Premium**: As the economy develops, the income and skill premium of highly - skilled labor gradually increase, which encourages more people to pursue higher education.
### Main Results of the Model
- **Individual Level**: Controlling for the level of education, an increase in income is positively correlated with an increase in fertility rate.
- **Aggregate Level**: Because more people pursue higher education, people with a high level of education have a lower fertility rate, resulting in a decline in the overall fertility rate of society as the average income increases.
### Empirical Analysis
The author uses data from the United States from 1950 to 2010 to calibrate the model and verify the predictive ability of the model. The results show that the model can explain about one - third of the actual decline in fertility rate, especially after considering the influence of the income and skill premium of highly - skilled labor.
### Conclusion
By introducing a model of educational choice and fertility decision - making, the paper successfully explains the contradiction in the relationship between income and fertility rate at the individual and aggregate levels. The model emphasizes the important role of educational investment in fertility decision - making and the negative impact of the income growth of highly - skilled labor on fertility rate.