Comparable results in total knee arthroplasty using the ROSA knee system versus the conventional technique: A retrospective propensity‐matched cohort study

Jakob Hax,Louis Leuthard,Gregor Baumann,Stefan Preiss,Vincent A. Stadelmann,Michael Worlicek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12330
2024-06-24
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Purpose Robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) is an increasingly popular alternative that may increase the accuracy of conventional TKA techniques. This study aims to evaluate RA‐TKA accuracy and compare its radiographic and clinical outcomes to conventional TKA (cTKA). Methods A retrospective examination of patients with bi‐ or tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis who underwent RA‐TKA (RObotic Surgical Assistant system) or cTKA and were prospectively documented in the TKA registry. Accuracy was assessed using standardized radiographic implant position evaluations, namely femoral and tibial coronal angles and femoral and tibial sagittal angles. Baseline demographics, surgery details and 6‐ and 12‐month post‐TKA patient‐reported outcomes (PROMs; e.g., Oxford Knee Score [OKS] and Core Outcome Measures Index) were compared between RA‐TKA and propensity score‐matched cTKA patients. Results Overall correlation between preset and 6‐week postoperative angle measurements for RA‐TKA was low with significant differences noted only for mean tibial sagittal angles (84.6° [RA‐TKA] vs. 82.3° [cTKA]) (p
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?