Abstract:Introduction: Skeletal anomalies are in the group of anomalies most difficult to be diagnosed antenatally. But, because of high lethality and morbidity rate as well as high possibility to be found again in the next pregnancy, they need to be systematically and actively looked for during every scan. Case report: A pregnant woman, aged 18, primigravida, was admitted to the Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology because of polyhydramnios and suspected multiple fetal malformations. Fetal biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference were adequate for 33 weeks gestation, whereas all the long bones were short for the gestational age. A detailed ultrasound morphology check was impossible because of the excessive amount of amniotic fluid, but the skull, brain, lungs, spine and abdomen appeared normal. There was an impression of frontal bossing and left-sided cleft lip. A thoraco-abdominal disproportion was evident. All the extremities were short, feet were normal, and hands were not extended during the whole scan. The woman underwent an uneventful amino-drainage and three days after that she ruptured the membranes, giving birth to a live female, 2150 gr, 46 cm, Apgar score 6/7. The anomalies seen on ultrasound were confirmed after birth. After a series of dyspnea the neonate was transferred to the Dept. of Paediatrics where it underwent a series of further extensive diagnostic procedures and 37 days after birth it passed away. Postmortem examination led to the following diagnoses: Neonatus femininus eutrophicus temporis aetatis. Defectus partis memebranacei septi interventricularis. Ductus arteriosus Botalli persistence. Hypoplasia thymi. Cheliognathopalatoschisis. Low set ears. Extremitates breves. Atelectasis subtotalis pulmonis bilateralis. Foramen ovale apertum cum valvula competent. Oedema cerebri gradus maioris. Discussion: Majority of fetal skeletal malformations can be relatively easily visualised during ultrasound scans and hence ultrasound is the most sensitive way of prenatal diagnosis of these anomalies. Maternal habitus, fetal position, alteration of amniotic fluid volume and gestational age can be factors that may aggravate check-ups. A prerogative for an early prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal anomalies is a well organized scan of each and every fetus that checks all bones, starting with the skull and finishing with hands and feet. Should an anomaly be found an extensive detailed scan by an expert should be performed, as well as karyotyping and a consultation with pediatrician/surgeon. In case of a lethal anomaly, an option of pregnancy termination should be considered and if the parents decide against it, the pregnancy should be closely monitored, with parents fully counseled about the prognosis for the child. In this case the anomaly was noted only after the 30th week of gestation and even then only because the patient came because she had some subjective difficulties because of the excessive amniotic fluid volume. On the other hand, some skeletal dysplasias can be diagnosed only in the late second, early third trimester and sometimes stay unnoticed until the end of pregnancy. This case could not be resolved definitely, for the anomalies were conclusive neither of a specific genetic syndrome, nor of an isolated skeletal dysplasia. Extensive further examination of parents as well as their families is needed in order to be able to give some information about the risks in the next pregnancy. Conclusion: Although skeletal anomalies are extremely difficult to diagnose antenatally, a detailed scan of a complete fetal anatomy between 20 and 32 gestational weeks with special attention given to the entire skeleton, gives certain assurance of excluding majority of major skeletal dysplasias or enables their diagnosis and further adequate plan for pregnancy management.

The likelihood of detecting abnormal karyotypes in fetuses with a single major anomaly or “soft” marker on ultrasonographic scanning

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: A Prospective Cohort Study and Meta‐analysis

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers

Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses With Ultrasonographic Soft Markers: A Meta-Anaysis of the Current Evidence

Association analysis between chromosomal abnormalities and fetal ultrasonographic soft markers based on 15,263 fetuses

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities

Clinical Experience of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in 6159 Ultrasonically Abnormal Fetuses

[Application of Chromosomal Karyotyping Analysis and Array CGH for Fetal Abnormalities Detected by Ultrasonography].

Diagnostic and prognostic role of soft ultrasound markers in prenatal detection and assessment of foetal abnormalities

Middle Pregnancy Ultrasound Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Diseases

Clinical Value and Effectiveness of Sonography Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities in the Middle and Late Pregnancy

Comparison of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnant Women with Fetal Ultrasonic Soft Markers

Cytogenetic analysis of 3387 umbilical cord blood in pregnant women at high risk for chromosomal abnormalities

Importance of a detailed anomaly scan after a cfDNA test indicating fetal trisomy 21, 18 or 13

Correlation of Sole Prenatal Indication to Fetal Chromosomal Karyotype Abnormality

[Study on Several Ultrasound Markers Combined Maternal Serum Biochemical Markers to Screen Fetal Chromosomal Aneuploidy at 11 to 13(+)6 Weeks of Gestation].

P25.01: the Relevance Study for Fetal Genetic Soft Marker, Structural Malformation and Chromosomal Abnormalities

[Prenatal diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia: case report of a fetus with multiple anomalies]

Detection of non‐cardiac fetal abnormalities by ultrasound at 11–14 weeks: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Predictive Ability of Ultrasound on Neonatal Diagnoses and Consequences on Prenatal Care Utilization