Erosion of CAD/CAM restorative materials and human enamel: An in vitro study

Hui Yang,Zhi-Cen Lu,Thomas Attin,Hao Yu,Zhi-cen Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104503
IF: 4.042
2021-07-01
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Abstract:<p>This <em>in vitro</em> study used the same frequency and duration of acid contact as a previous <em>in situ/in vivo</em> study to evaluate the effect of erosion on CAD/CAM restorative materials and human enamel and to compare the effects of <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in situ/in vivo</em> acid challenges on CAD/CAM restorative materials and human enamel. The CAD/CAM restorative materials (IPS e.max CAD, Lava Ultimate, and PMMA block) and human enamel were eroded by immersion in 150 ml of cola drink for 14 days (4 <span class="math"><math>×</math></span> 5 min/day). The surface microhardness and surface roughness of the specimens were measured at baseline (T1), day 7 (T2), and day 14 (T3). The substance losses were measured at T2 and T3. The data were statistically analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's test (α = 0.05). Erosion significantly decreased the surface microhardness of the CAD/CAM restorative materials and human enamel (all P &lt; 0.001). The overall percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMH<sub>l</sub>) of the PMMA block and enamel due to <em>in vitro</em> erosion was significantly higher than that due to <em>in situ/in vivo</em> erosion (P = 0.02 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). Consistent with <em>in situ/in vivo</em> erosion, the surface roughness and profile of the tested restorative materials remained unchanged after <em>in vitro</em> erosion. A significant increase in the surface roughness and substance loss was observed for enamel after <em>in vitro</em> erosion (all P &lt; 0.001). The overall substance loss of enamel due to <em>in vitro</em> erosion was significantly higher than that due to <em>in situ/in vivo</em> erosion (P &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, erosion decreased the surface microhardness of the CAD/CAM restorative materials and human enamel. Moreover, erosion negatively influenced the substance loss and surface roughness of human enamel. For the substance loss of enamel and %SMH<sub>l</sub> of PMMA block and enamel, the <em>in vitro</em> erosive effects were approximately 1–2 times greater than the <em>in situ/in vivo</em> effects. However, for the surface roughness and profile of the CAD/CAM restorative materials, no significant difference was found between <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in situ/in vivo</em> erosion.</p>
engineering, biomedical,materials science, biomaterials
What problem does this paper attempt to address?