Abstract:Microseismic monitoring system is one of the effective means to monitor ground stress in deep mines. The accuracy and speed of microseismic signal identification directly affect the stability analysis in rock engineering. At present, manual identification, which heavily relies on manual experience, is widely used to classify microseismic events and blasts in the mines. To realize intelligent and accurate identification of microseismic events and blasts, a microseismic signal identification system based on machine learning was established in this work. The discrimination of microseismic events and blasts was established based on the machine learning framework. The microseismic monitoring data was used to optimize the parameters and validate the classification methods. Subsequently, ten machine learning algorithms were used as the preliminary algorithms of the learning layer, including the Decision Tree, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, SVM, KNN, GBDT, Naive Bayes, Bagging, AdaBoost, and MLP. Then, training set and test set, accounting for 50% of each data set, were prospectively examined, and the ACC, PPV, SEN, NPV, SPE, FAR and ROC curves were used as evaluation indexes. Finally, the performances of these machine learning algorithms in microseismic signal identification were evaluated with cross-validation methods. The results showed that the Logistic Regression classifier had the best performance in parameter identification, and the accuracy of cross-validation can reach more than 0.95. Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naive Bayes also performed well in this data set. There were some differences in the accuracy of different classifiers in the training set, test set, and all data sets. To improve the accuracy of signal identification, the database of microseismic events and blasts should be expanded, to avoid the inaccurate data distribution caused by the small training set. Artificial intelligence identification methods, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and AdaBoost algorithms, were applied to signal identification of the microseismic monitoring system in mines, and the identification results were consistent with the actual situation. In this way, the confusion caused by manual classification between microseismic events and blasts based on the characteristics of waveform signals is solved, and the required source parameters are easily obtained, which can ensure the accuracy and timeliness of microseismic events and blasts identification.

Quality control of microseismic P-phase arrival picks in coal mine based on machine learning

The CGAS Deep Learning Algorithm for P-Wave Arrival Time Picking of Mining Microseismic Events

Automatic Microseismic Event Picking Via Unsupervised Machine Learning

Machine Learning Based Identification of Microseismic Signals Using Characteristic Parameters

Automatic P-phase picking based on machine learning and AIC algorithm and its application in engineering geological hazards warning

Classification of Clustered Microseismic Events in a Coal Mine Using Machine Learning

Automated microseismic event arrival picking and multichannel recognition and location

Using machine learning approach for microseismic events recognition in underground excavations: Comparison of ten frequently-used models

Automatic P-Phase-Onset-Time-Picking Method of Microseismic Monitoring Signal of Underground Mine Based on Noise Reduction and Multiple Detection Indexes

Application of a convolutional neural network for seismic phase picking of mining-induced seismicity

Application of Machine Learning Methods in Arrival Time Picking of P Waves from Reservoir Earthquakes

An Automatic P-wave Onset Time Picking Method for Mining-Induced Microseismic Data Based on Long Short-Term Memory Deep Neural Network

Automatic High-Resolution Microseismic Event Detection Via Supervised Machine Learning

A Machine Learning-enhanced Robust P-Phase Picker for Real-time Seismic Monitoring

A machine-learning-based method of detecting and picking the first P -wave arrivals of acoustic emission events in laboratory experiments

Automatic Phase Picking from Microseismic Recordings Using Feature Extraction and Neural Network

Automatic phase detection and arrival picking for microseismic events in hydraulic fracturing based on machine learning and array correlation

Discriminant models of blasts and seismic events in mine seismology

Automatic Classification of Microseismic Signals Based on MFCC and GMM-HMM in Underground Mines

Discrimination of Mining Microseismic Events and Blasts Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Original Waveform

MSNet: A Seismic Phase Picking Network Applicable to Microseismic Monitoring