Abstract:Rapid increase of seismic data poses challenges to seismic data processing, in which phase-picking is a crucial procedure and accordingly attracts attention from seismologists. Among the breakthroughs in deep learning methods for seismic data processing, seismologists have especially proposed many seismic phase-picking methods based on deep learning, which have shown much better accuracy than traditional automatic phase-picking methods. However, further improvements are needed to meet the requirements for processing continuous seismic records. Here we propose a new approach combining seismic array scheme and U-Net, an end-to-end neural network developed in image segmentation. Previous studies have shown that U-Net can classify waveforms and determine the onset of seismic phases accurately with the help of contracting and expanding paths. Based on U-Net, we first design a deep learning phase picker (PP) model with a long (40 s) time window. To avoid difficulties in time window selection and interference between P- and S-phase identifications, the model involves two networks with the same structure, which pick the P and S phases separately. To improve model training, we employ data transformation to expand the sample set, add typical noises to the sample set for better resemblance of real data, and slightly increase the weight of the seismic signal containing seismic records for a better balance between precision and recall. We also adopt a more effective array-assisted phase picker (APP) model which correlates the picking results from different stations to minimize misidentification. Using data from Hi-net and Alibaba Aftershock AI Capture Contest, we design training and test sets of different sizes to examine the performance and generalization ability of the model. Results show that the APP can effectively pick the body-wave phases on continuous records with a good generalization ability. The relationship between the model performance and training set is such that the model performance is directly related to the data quality rather than the size of the training set, and there is no serious overfitting even for a small training set. Statistics further show that the model has no special requirements for the locations of time windows and can handle seismic records with large epicentral distances. By comparison with other models (model with short time windows or the one of simultaneous picking of P- and S-phases), we find that APP can successfully process event-crowded waveform data and effectively reduce the influence of noise. Finally, we apply the trained model to a seismic network in the Inner Mongolia. Results show that the number of earthquakes detected by the APP is 30 times the manually-detected one, and that 98.1% of the events in the catalog are detected by the APP. The successful application to a seismic network different from the training set suggests that the APP is robust and has strong generalization ability.

Automatic phase detection and arrival picking for microseismic events in hydraulic fracturing based on machine learning and array correlation

Active Source Seismic Identification and Automatic Picking of the P ̄wave First Arrival Using a Convolutional Neural Network 1

An Array-Assisted Deep Learning Approach to Seismic Phase-Picking

Automatic P-phase picking based on machine learning and AIC algorithm and its application in engineering geological hazards warning

Arrival Picking Method for Microseismic Phases Based on Curve Fitting

Automatic Time Picking for Weak Seismic Phase in the Strong Noise and Interference Environment: An Hybrid Method Based on Array Similarity

Research on the seismic phase picking method based on the deep convolution neural network

An Improved Method for Hydrofracture Induced Microseismic Event Detection and Phase Picking

Earthquake detection and automatic phase picking

A Machine Learning-enhanced Robust P-Phase Picker for Real-time Seismic Monitoring

Automatic Microseismic Event Detection and Arrival Picking Based on Waveform Cross-Correlation

Toward Fully Autonomous Seismic Networks: Backprojecting Deep Learning-Based Phase Time Functions for Earthquake Monitoring on Continuous Recordings

CubeNet: Array-Based Seismic Phase Picking with Deep Learning

A combined method for automatic microseismic event detection and arrival picking

Automatic High-Resolution Microseismic Event Detection Via Supervised Machine Learning

Phase Neural Operator for Multi-Station Picking of Seismic Arrivals

Phase arrival picking for bridging multi-source downhole microseismic data using deep transfer learning

Automatic Microseismic Event Picking Via Unsupervised Machine Learning

Automatic Phase Picking from Microseismic Recordings Using Feature Extraction and Neural Network

Improved Methods for Detection and Arrival Picking of Microseismic Events with Low Signal-to-noise Ratios

The temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of induced seismicity in the Changning shale gas field based on dense array