Abstract:The new ways of organising work and offering services on the market through the so-called digital platforms seem to have put the traditional legal standards for classifying employment relationships into question. The mechanism of functioning of digital platforms, in fact, seems to put together a series of ‘old’ problems in a new combination. On the one hand, platforms present themselves on the market as subjects with an apparently rarefied organisational structure, moving along the threads of algorithms; on the other hand, those who collaborate with them seem to do so in a spontaneous, voluntary, random and flexible way. The radical fragmentation, or reduction to the minimum, of the productive organisation, is accompanied by the fragmentation of the work activity itself, made by an anonymous multitude of people (‘crowd’), who move together in the light of invisible dynamics, dictated by unknown algorithms.Academic scholarship - and in some countries also case law - has already offered many and different answers to the problem of the legal classification of the relationship of those who work for/with the platforms. They vary according to the methodological approaches and the systems used as a reference.The present paper argues that it is not possible to provide for a general answer to such question, valid for every concrete case. In fact, the specific features of each relationship between the platform and the workers might largely vary from case to case.However, some elements that are functional to the solution of the classification issue are still disputable and shall be clarified: (a) in most of the cases, the platform does not act as a mere intermediary between the supply and demand for a certain service; instead, it represents the direct supplier of that service, which is provided through the activities of the workers; therefore, the workers are fully integrated into the platforms’ organisation; (b) in the light of the rating mechanism and the adoption of certain contractual clauses on withdrawal – that will be described –, often the worker is made illegitimately liable for the unfulfilment of the obligations to the customer; (c) when the conditions a) and b) occur, a substantial overlap between the business carried out by digital platforms and the workers’ activities can be detected and this shall be taken into consideration in the investigation on the legal status of the workers, especially in order to prevent any attempt to circumvent the application of the employment law protections.

A simple comparative model of worker‐managed and capital‐managed digital platforms

Why Isn't Uber Worker-Managed? A Model of Digital Platform Cooperatives

Coordinating Supply and Demand on an On-Demand Platform: Price, Wage, and Payout Ratio

Do Workers and Customers Benefit from Competition Between On-Demand Service Platforms?

Hybrid Platform Model

Micro-assets and portfolio management in the new platform economy

Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy

Switching Cost, Network Externality and Platform Competition

A Model of Capital Allocation, Education, and Job Choice in China

Digitalisation and work: challenges from the platform-economy

Competition policy in a general‐equilibrium platform economy

Platform business models and strategic price interaction

Comparative Analysis of Portfolio Management Models: Markowitz, CAPM, and Multi-Factor Models

Two-Sided Capacitated Submodular Maximization in Gig Platforms

Platform-Mediated Competition

When A Platform Competes with Third-Party Sellers in Networked Markets: A Revenue Management Perspective

Decreasing Wages in Gig Economy: A Game Theoretic Explanation Using Mathematical Program Networks

Platform market competition with endogenous side decisions

Working with algorithmic management: Design logic, algorithmic unfitness, and labor repair behind the wall

Strategic introduction of marketplace platform and its impacts on supply chain