How is leadership behavior associated with organization-related variables? Translation and psychometric evaluation of the implementation leadership scale in German primary healthcare
Sara Söling,Holger Pfaff,Ute Karbach,Lena Ansmann,Juliane Köberlein-Neu,AdAM-Study Group,Petra Kellermann-Mühlhoff,Lara Düvel,Till Beckmann,Reinhard Hammerschmidt,Julia Jachmich,Eva Leicher,Benjamin Brandt,Johanna Richard,Frank Meyer,Mathias Flume,Thomas Müller,Ferdinand M Gerlach,Christiane Muth,Ana Isabel Gonzalez-Gonzalez,Kiran Chapidi,Robin Brünn,Peter Ihle,Ingo Meyer,Nina Timmesfeld,Hans J Trampisch,Renate Klaaßen-Mielke,Jale Basten,Wolfgang Greiner,Bastian Suhrmann,Alexandra Piotrowski,Karolina Beifuß,Sarah Meyer,Daniel Grandt,Simone Grandt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08434-z
2022-08-20
Abstract:Background: The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) was developed to assess leadership behavior with regard to being proactive, knowledgeable, supportive, or perseverant in implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs). As part of a study on the implementation of a digitally supported polypharmacy management application in primary care, the original ILS was translated and validated for use in the German language. Rationale: This study aimed to translate the original ILS into German and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: The validation sample consisted of 198 primary care physicians in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in which the intervention group implemented a digitally supported clinical decision support system for polypharmacy management. The ILS was assessed using a 12-item scale. The study included a process evaluation with two evaluation waves between 2019 and 2021. The ILS was used within this process evaluation study to assess the leadership support with regard to the implementation of the polypharmacy management. The ILS was translated in a multi-step process, including pre-testing of the instrument and triple, back-and-forth translation of the instrument. We tested the reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and validity (construct and criterion-related validity) of the scale. Results: The four-dimensional structure of the instrument was confirmed (comparative fit index = .97; root mean square error of approximation = .06). Convergent validity was demonstrated by correlations with organizational innovation climate, social capital, and workload, which was consistent with the proposed hypothesis. Criterion-related validity of the ILS was demonstrated by predicting the organizational readiness for change scores using structural equation modeling. The reliability of the scale was good (α = .875). Conclusion: The German version of the ILS created in this study is a reliable and valid measure. The original four-dimensional structure of the ILS was confirmed in a primary care setting. Further psychometric testing is needed to establish the validity and reliability of the ILS and to transfer it to other health care settings. It is a useful tool for identifying the areas for implementation leadership development. Further research is needed on how, why, and when distinct types of leadership behaviors have different effects on healthcare organizations in implementation processes.