Abstract:Abstract This paper aims to give detailed insights of interactional aspects of students’ agency, reasoning, and collaboration, in their attempt to solve a linear function problem together. Four student pairs from a Norwegian upper secondary school suggested and explained ideas, tested it out, and evaluated their solution methods. The student–student interactions were studied by characterizing students’ individual mathematical reasoning, collaborative processes, and exercised agency. In the analysis, two interaction patterns emerged from the roles in how a student engaged or refrained from engaging in the collaborative work. Students’ engagement reveals aspects of how collaborative processes and mathematical reasoning co-exist with their agencies, through two ways of interacting: bi-directional interaction and one-directional interaction. Four student pairs illuminate how different roles in their collaboration are connected to shared agency or individual agency for merging knowledge together in shared understanding. In one-directional interactions, students engaged with different agencies as a primary agent, leading the conversation, making suggestions and explanations sometimes anchored in mathematical properties, or, as a secondary agent, listening and attempting to understand ideas are expressed by a peer. A secondary agent rarely reasoned mathematically. Both students attempted to collaborate, but rarely or never disagreed. The interactional pattern in bi-directional interactions highlights a mutual attempt to collaborate where both students were the driving forces of the problem-solving process. Students acted with similar roles where both were exercising a shared agency, building the final argument together by suggesting, accepting, listening, and negotiating mathematical properties. A critical variable for such a successful interaction was the collaborative process of repairing their shared understanding and reasoning anchored in mathematical properties of linear functions.

Sociomathematical scaffolding as students engage in revising draft definitions, conjectures, and proofs

Teaching practices that support revising definition drafts to adhere to mathematical norms

Posing Fundable Questions in Mathematics and Science Education

Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics An essay from a didactical perspective

From Collaborative Construction, Through Whole-Class Presentation, to a Posteriori Reflection: Proof Progression in a Topology Classroom

Transforming Perceptions of Proof: A Four-Part Instructional Sequence

Student Sense-Making in Post-Secondary Introductory Proof Courses: An Argument for and Outline of a Methodological Approach

Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving

Scaffolding in Mathematics Learning Social Arithmetic Material to Improve Students' Mathematical Thinking

Task design for ways of working: making distinctions in teaching and learning mathematics

Taming Fantastic Beasts of Mathematics: Struggling with Incommensurability

Supporting Mathematical Discussions: the Roles of Comparison and Cognitive Load

A model for scaffolding mathematical problem-solving: From theory to practice

Beyond deficit-based models of learners' cognition: Interpreting engineering students' difficulties with sense-making in terms of fine-grained epistemological and conceptual dynamics

Unboxing mathematics: creating a culture of modeling as critic

Supporting emergent modelling by implementing model eliciting activities: the case of 3D-Euclidean geometry

Providing students with agency to self-scaffold in a computational science and engineering course

“Shh!”: Shifting discourse patterns and techniques of surveillance in middle-school mathematics classrooms

Effect of Scaffolding on Helping Introductory Physics Students Solve Quantitative Problems Involving Strong Alternative Conceptions

Transitioning to proof via writing scripts on the rules of a new discourse

Teaching the Conceptual Structure of Mathematics