Untangling global levelised cost of electricity based on multi-factor learning curve for renewable energy: Wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower and bioenergy

Yue Yao,Jin-Hua Xu,De-Qiang Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124827
IF: 11.1
2021-02-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Renewable energy offers a less expensive source of electricity globally for the energy sector’s transformation towards a sustainable energy system. This paper untangles the driving mechanism behind the global renewable energy levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) development for seven promising renewable energy technologies from 2010 to 2018: onshore wind, offshore wind, solar photovoltaic, concentrating solar power (CSP), geothermal, hydropower and bioenergy. This research provides a comprehensive and repeatable version of multi-factor learning curve (MFLC) method based on a cost minimization approach, Cobb-Douglas function and engineering analysis to analyze factors affecting the renewable power generation cost. Capacity factors are highlighted as the indicators for natural resource volatility and technology progress. The modified MFLC models show that capacity factor effect, installed cost effect and learning effect are the main drivers of cost reduction. Rapidly declining wind and solar costs are driven by the competitive installed costs and upgraded technology in areas with excellent natural wind and solar resources. The irregular cost movements of geothermal, hydropower and bioenergy are heavily influenced by the site-specific characteristics of these projects, reflecting the high natural resource volatility and diversity in capital across regions.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the driving mechanisms for the decline in the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of different renewable energy technologies on a global scale. Specifically, the author studied the cost - change trends of seven promising renewable energy technologies (onshore wind energy, offshore wind energy, solar photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, geothermal energy, hydropower, and biomass energy) from 2010 to 2018 and analyzed the key factors influencing these cost changes. ### Main problems of the paper 1. **Driving factors for cost decline**: - **Multi - factor learning curve (MFLC)**: The traditional single - factor learning curve (OFLC) can only explain cost changes over time and cannot take other driving factors into account. Therefore, the author proposed a multi - factor learning curve model based on the cost - minimization method, the Cobb - Douglas function, and engineering analysis to more comprehensively analyze the factors affecting the cost of renewable energy power generation. - **Capacity factor effect**: The capacity factor is used as an indicator of natural resource fluctuations and technological progress. An increase in the capacity factor can significantly reduce the power generation cost. - **Installation cost effect**: The decline in installation cost is also an important factor in cost reduction. - **Learning effect**: Through "Learning - by - Doing (LBD)" and "Learning - by - Searching (LBS)", technological progress and cost reduction are complementary. 2. **Cost - change trends of different technologies**: - **Wind and solar energy**: The costs of these technologies have declined rapidly, mainly due to competitive installation costs and technological upgrades in areas with high - quality natural resources. - **Geothermal energy, hydropower, and biomass energy**: The cost changes of these technologies are more irregular and are greatly affected by the characteristics of specific project sites, reflecting the diversity of natural resource fluctuations and capital distribution. ### Specific research methods 1. **Theoretical model**: - **Cost - minimization method**: Combine three input factors of labor, capital, and materials to establish a cost - minimization equation. - **Cobb - Douglas production function**: Introduce a natural resource fluctuation index to modify the traditional production function. - **Multi - factor learning curve**: Consider the influence of cumulative installed capacity and knowledge stock on cost. 2. **Simplified empirical model**: - **Input price**: Replace capital cost with installation cost and simplify the material price to a single main material price. - **Production capacity**: Use the capacity factor as a proxy variable for electricity production to comprehensively reflect the influence of the learning effect and natural resource quality. ### Main conclusions - **Wind and solar energy**: The main driving forces for cost decline are the capacity factor effect, installation cost effect, and learning effect. - **Geothermal energy, hydropower, and biomass energy**: The cost changes of these technologies are greatly affected by the characteristics of specific project sites, and the traditional single - factor learning curve is difficult to explain their cost - change trends. Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a scientific basis for future energy investment decisions and optimize the development planning of renewable energy.