Abstract:The major barriers for applying carbon dioxide (CO2) capture technology to coal-fired power plants in China and worldwide are the consequent drop in power plant energy efficiency and significantly higher cost of electricity (COE). This paper proposes a new perspective for determining the most cost-efficient CO2 capture ratio using a modeling and simulation approach that balances the per unit parasitic energy consumption for absorbent regeneration with the per unit capital cost of the CO2 capture unit of a coal-fired power plant. Using a typical 550 MW supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plant in China as the reference plant, with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption unit for CO2 capture, a process model of the power generation unit together with the MEA CO2 capture unit was developed and detailed process simulations were conducted with the model. Then, a sensitivity analysis was then conducted to study the impact on key plant behavior indicators, including per unit energy penalty for absorbent regeneration, net power output and power generation efficiency, total capital cost of the power plant together with the MEA CO2 absorption unit, per unit capital cost of the MEA unit, COE, as well as the per unit CO2 avoidance cost (indicated by cost per tonne (t) CO2 avoided), across a CO2 capture ratio range between 20% and 99%. The results show that when CO2 capture ratio is low, while the unit energy consumption for absorbent regeneration per tCO2 avoided increases steadily with the increase of CO2 capture ratio, the cost per tCO2 avoided decreases as the MEA absorption train is scaled up given the high capital cost of each MEA train. After CO2 capture ratio reaches certain level (60% for this plant), the cost per tCO2 avoided starts to increase with CO2 capture ratio, since the unit energy consum- - ption for absorbent regeneration per tCO2 avoided has increased to so high that it supplants the scaling effect of the MEA train and becomes the dominant factor that determines the increase or decrease trend of the cost per tCO2 avoided. Besides, due to the physical restraint on the upper bound of CO2 capture capability of one single MEA train by the diameter of the absorber, an additional MEA train is needed when the CO2 capture ratio increases to certain points (40% and 85% for this plant), resulting in jumps of several parameters including the total capital cost for the power plant and MEA CO2 capture unit, per unit capital cost for the MEA CO2 capture unit, and last the cost per tCO2 avoided. Based on all these result, finally a cost-optimal CO2 capture ratio of 40% (365 RMB/tCO2-_avoided) was obtained, which is easier for the power plant to bear while realizing a significant reduction in CO2 emission of this plant. Therefore, applying this approach for determining CO2 capture ratios could help minimize the barrier for the initiation of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) in China's power industry. Besides, future replacement or improvement for the MEA CO2 capture technology has the potential to further reduce the cost per tCO2 avoided, which needs special attention.

Understanding cost reduction of China's biomass direct combustion power generation—A study based on learning curve model

The Regional Cost of Biomass Direct Combustion Power Generation in China and Development Potential Analysis

An Economic and Technology Analysis of a New High-Efficiency Biomass Cogeneration System: A Case Study in DC County, China

Carbon Efficiency and Abatement Cost of China's Coal-Fired Power Plants

Estimating the Environmental Efficiency and Marginal CO2 Abatement Cost of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China

Technical-economic-environmental analysis of biomass direct and indirect co-firing in pulverized coal boiler in China

Economic feasibility assessment of coal-biomass co-firing power generation technology

Coal-Biomass Co-Firing Power Generation Technology: Current Status, Challenges and Policy Implications

Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Analysis of Biomass Energy Technology in China: A Brief Review

Unit-level cost-benefit analysis for coal power plants retrofitted with biomass co-firing at a national level by combined GIS and life cycle assessment

Analysis of Energy, Carbon Emissions and Economics During the Life Cycle of Biomass Power Generation: Case Comparison from China

Gas or electricity? Regional pathway selection under carbon neutrality target: A case study of industrial boilers

CO2 Capture Cost Reduction Potential of the Coal-Fired Power Plants under High Penetration of Renewable Power in China

Progress and Prospect of CCS in China: Using Learning Curve to Assess the Cost-Viability of a 2×600MW Retrofitted Oxyfuel Power Plant As a Case Study

Reducing initial barriers for CCS deployment on pulverized coal-fired power plants in China by optimizing the capture ratio of carbon dioxide

Mapping the economy of coal power plants retrofitted with post-combustion and biomass co-firing carbon capture in China

A biomass-coal co-firing based bi-level optimal approach for carbon emission reduction in China

The economics of clean coal power generation with carbon capture and storage technology in China

Analysis of Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential and Cost for China's Power Generation Sector

Significant co-benefits of air pollutant and CO2 emission reduction from biomass energy utilization in power plants in China

Multi-scope Decarbonization and Environmental Impacts Evaluation for Biomass Fuels Co-Firing CHP Units in China