Abstract:Electric grid faults are increasingly the source of ignition for major wildfires. To reduce the likelihood of such ignitions in high risk situations, utilities use preemptive de‐energization of power lines, commonly referred to as Public Safety Power Shutoffs. This article develops the Security Constrained Optimal Power Shutoff problem, adding post‐contingency security constraints to the extend the Optimal Power Shutoff problem of planning power shutoffs to limit wildfire ignition risk, This model enables finding more secure shutoff plans with similar wildfire ignition risk, and can find new tradeoffs between pre‐contingency planned load shed and post‐contingency unplanned load shed. Electric grid faults are increasingly the source of ignition for major wildfires. To reduce the likelihood of such ignitions in high risk situations, utilities use preemptive de‐energization of power lines, commonly referred to as Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS). Besides raising challenging trade‐offs between power outages and wildfire safety, PSPS removes redundancy from the network at a time when component faults are likely to happen. This may leave the network particularly vulnerable to unexpected line faults that may occur while the PSPS is in place. Previous works have not explicitly considered the impacts of these outages. To address this gap, the Security Constrained Optimal Power Shutoff problem is proposed which uses post‐contingency security constraints to model the impact of unexpected line faults when planning a PSPS. This model enables, for the first time, the exploration of a wide range of trade‐offs between both wildfire risk and pre‐ and post‐contingency load shedding when designing PSPS plans, providing useful insights for utilities and policy makers considering different approaches to PSPS. The efficacy of the model is demonstrated using the EPRI 39‐bus system as a case study. The results highlight the potential risks of not considering security constraints when planning PSPS and show that incorporating security constraints into the PSPS design process improves the resilience of current PSPS plans.

Quantifying the Risk of Wildfire Ignition by Power Lines Under Extreme Weather Conditions

Sequential Steady-State Security Region-Based Transmission Power System Resilience Enhancement

A Sequentially Preventive Model Enhancing Power System Resilience Against Extreme-Weather-triggered Failures

Risk-Averse Resilient Operation of Electricity Grid Under the Risk of Wildfire

Wildfire Risk Metric Impact on Public Safety Power Shut-off Cost Savings

Quantifying Metrics for Wildfire Ignition Risk from Geographic Data in Power Shutoff Decision-Making

Wildfire Resilient Unit Commitment under Uncertain Demand

Optimizing Transmission Infrastructure Investments to Support Line De-energization for Mitigating Wildfire Ignition Risk

Wildfire-Induced Risk Assessment to Enable Resilient and Sustainable Electric Power Grid

The Dilemma of Electricity Grid Expansion Planning in Areas at the Risk of Wildfire

Multi-period Power System Risk Minimization under Wildfire Disruptions

Equitable Networked Microgrid Topology Reconfiguration for Wildfire Risk Mitigation

Balancing Wildfire Risk and Power Outages through Optimized Power Shut-Offs

Mitigating the Impact of Uncertain Wildfire Risk on Power Grids through Topology Control

Security constrained optimal power shutoff for wildfire risk mitigation

A Preventive-Corrective Scheme for Ensuring Power System Security During Active Wildfire Risks

Security Constrained Optimal Power Shutoff

Predicting electricity infrastructure induced wildfire risk in California

A framework for risk assessment and optimal line upgrade selection to mitigate wildfire risk

Decision-Dependent Uncertainty-Aware Distribution System Planning Under Wildfire Risk

Optimal Load Shedding for Public Safety Power Shutoffs