Quantifying Metrics for Wildfire Ignition Risk from Geographic Data in Power Shutoff Decision-Making

Ryan Piansky,Sofia Taylor,Noah Rhodes,Daniel K. Molzahn,Line A. Roald,Jean-Paul Watson
2024-10-01
Abstract:Faults on power lines and other electric equipment are known to cause wildfire ignitions. To mitigate the threat of wildfire ignitions from electric power infrastructure, many utilities preemptively de-energize power lines, which may result in power shutoffs. Data regarding wildfire ignition risks are key inputs for effective planning of power line de-energizations. However, there are multiple ways to formulate risk metrics that spatially aggregate wildfire risk map data, and there are different ways of leveraging this data to make decisions. The key contribution of this paper is to define and compare the results of employing six metrics for quantifying the wildfire ignition risks of power lines from risk maps, considering both threshold- and optimization-based methods for planning power line de-energizations. The numeric results use the California Test System (CATS), a large-scale synthetic grid model with power line corridors accurately representing California infrastructure, in combination with real Wildland Fire Potential Index data for a full year. This is the first application of optimal power shutoff planning on such a large and realistic test case. Our results show that the choice of risk metric significantly impacts the lines that are de-energized and the resulting load shed. We find that the optimization-based method results in significantly less load shed than the threshold-based method while achieving the same risk reduction.
Systems and Control
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how to quantify the risk of wildfires caused by transmission lines from geographic data to assist power systems in making decisions during planned outages. Specifically, the paper focuses on two main challenges: 1. **How to define the wildfire risk of transmission lines using wildfire risk maps**: Transmission lines typically traverse multiple areas with varying potential wildfire risks, so a method is needed to synthesize these risk values to derive a single risk value for the entire line. 2. **How to use these risk metrics to make outage decisions to reduce wildfire risk**: The paper compares six different risk metric methods (including maximum value, average value, cumulative value, and their high-risk threshold versions) and evaluates the effectiveness of these metrics in two decision-making methods (threshold-based methods and optimization methods). Through this research, the paper aims to provide power system operators with more effective tools and methods to balance wildfire risk and power supply reliability.