Abstract:The arms trade involves the international sale or importation of conventional arms. This means the proliferation of any non-nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons. Today the global transfer of arms is a multi-billion dollar a year industry. The US has the world’s largest military expenditure and is known as the world’s greatest proliferator of conventional weapons. China in the past few years has maintained a position as one of the world’s largest importers of arms, and has recently taken the spot as the world’s second largest military expenditure. Data from watchdog organizations suggests that the world is currently in a period of militarization that is fast approaching, militarization levels during the Cold War. Africa, Asia, the Middle East, the Americas, and Europe are all showing general patterns of increasing arms transfers. The reasoning behind the build up is difficult to say. Insecurity due to terrorism, scarce resources, wars in the Middle East, payment of bribes, or shifting foreign policies may all influence a nations decision to increase arms transfers. Transfers of weapons between nations often give some insight into the overall relations between the two nations. China and the US have a history of uncertainty and distrust, and thus actual arms transfers and military agreements between these two nations are relatively uncommon. Nations that have long standing relationships tend to transfer arms on a more frequent basis. Therefore, by analyzing the global arms market one may better understand foreign relations. The arms trade is a very lucrative business for the manufacturing companies. The US alone is home to nearly fifty of the worlds 100 most profitable arms companies. China does not have a single company in the world’s top 100, however China is still a major factor in the arms transfer arena (due to high importation of weapons). China’s combined surplus of foreign trade dollars and extensive production capabilities make China potentially one of the greatest proliferators of conventional weapons in the future. The production of these weapons, while lucrative, is often destructive and counteractive to democracy. Unfortunately, the majority of arms deliveries are sent to developing nations that are more prone to human rights abuses and violations of international law. This disregard

Did CIA interventions increase US arms exports? Evidence from the Cold War (1962-1989)

Network-based Study on the Relationship Between Arms Exports and Foreign Policies

A Comparative Look at the Post Cold War Chinese and US Arms Trade

Arming the Peace: Foreign Security Assistance and Human Rights Conditions in Post-Conflict Countries

Can Arms Embargoes Stop the Weapon Transfers to Target States? An Exploratory Meta-Analysis

The Formation and Evolution of American Policy on Transfer of Conventional Weapons (1947～1992)

America'S Military Interventionism: A Social Evolutionary Interpretation

Why Governments Have Their Troops Trained Abroad: Evidence from Latin America

Product Adjustments of Multi-Product Exporters: Evidence from Us-China Trade War

Do immigrants counter the effect of cultural distance on trade? Evidence from US state-level exports

Do Major-Power Interventions Encourage the Onset of Civil Conflict? A Structural Analysis

National Sentiment and Consumer Choice: The Iraq War and Sales of US Products in Arab Countries

Targeting profits: The economic impact of arms embargoes on defense companies

Training Foreign Militaries for Peace – U.S. IMET and Militarized Interstate Disputes 1976-2007

Tracking the rise of United States foreign military training: IMTAD-USA, a new dataset and research agenda

Militarized Conflict, Trade, and Economic Development in a Structural Equation Model With Spatial Considerations

Conflict or Cooperation: A Survival Analysis of the Relationship between Regional Trade Agreements and Military Conflict

Reward, punishment or inducement? US economic and military aid, 1946–1996

The Cold War Computer Arms Race

Political and Economic Consequences of Humanitarian Military Interventions in Targeted Nations

United States Intervention and the Following Hegemony in Cuba and Chile: A Critical Appraisal