Abstract:We used a multi-dimensional framework to assess current stereotypes of men and women. Specifically, we sought to determine (1) how men and women are characterized by male and female raters, (2) how men and women characterize themselves, and (3) the degree of convergence between self-characterizations and charcterizations of one's gender group. In an experimental study, 628 U.S. male and female raters described men, women, or themselves on scales representing multiple dimensions of the two defining features of gender stereotypes, agency and communality: assertiveness, independence, instrumental competence, leadership competence (agency dimensions), and concern for others, sociability and emotional sensitivity (communality dimensions). Results indicated that stereotypes about communality persist and were equally prevalent for male and female raters, but agency characterizations were more complex. Male raters generally descibed women as being less agentic than men and as less agentic than female raters described them. However, female raters differentiated among agency dimensions and described women as less assertive than men but as equally independent and leadership competent. Both male and female raters rated men and women equally high on instrumental competence. Gender stereotypes were also evident in self-characterizations, with female raters rating themselves as less agentic than male raters and male raters rating themselves as less communal than female raters, although there were exceptions (no differences in instrumental competence, independence, and sociability self-ratings for men and women). Comparisons of self-ratings and ratings of men and women in general indicated that women tended to characterize themselves in more stereotypic terms - as less assertive and less competent in leadership - than they characterized others in their gender group. Men, in contrast, characterized themselves in less stereotypic terms - as more communal. Overall, our results show that a focus on facets of agency and communality can provide deeper insights about stereotype content than a focus on overall agency and communality.

Does Culture Moderate Gender Stereotypes? Individualism Predicts Communal (but Not Agentic) Prescriptions for Men Across 62 Nations

Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content.

Sex Differences In Social Cynicism Across Societies: The Role Of Men'S Higher Competitiveness And Male Dominance

The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves

Harder Won and Easier Lost? Testing the Double Standard in Gender Rules in 62 Countries

Culture Moderates the Relation Between Gender Inequality and Well-Being

Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.

Catching Up With Wonderful Women: The Women-Are-Wonderful Effect Is Smaller In More Gender Egalitarian Societies

Gender Stereotypes About Career and Family Are Stronger in More Economically Developed Countries and Can Explain the Gender Equality Paradox

Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings.

Societal gender role beliefs moderate the pattern of gender differences in public- and private-sphere pro-environmental behaviors

Who Approves of Gossip, Ostracism, and Confrontation Following Norm Violations? A Cross-Cultural Test of Gender Stereotypes

Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future: Evidence of Dynamic Gender Stereotypes in Ghana

Personality and gender differences in global perspective

Gender Stereotypes of Personality

A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Masculinity and Relationships in Men From Turkey, Norway, and the United States

Does National Context Matter When Women Surpass Their Partner in Status?

Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences

Catching up with wonderful women

Gender attitudes and the new cultural divide in Europe

The Gender Paradox: Understanding the Role of Masculinity in Suicidal Ideation