Efficacy and safety of retention enema with traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Zi-Xing Yan,You-Mei Liu,Teng Ma,Meng-Jun Xu,Xiao-Bin Zhang,Xiao-Jing Zha,Jian-Hua Yang,Peng Jiang,Xi Chen,Zhen-Wen Lin,Yan-Hua Wu,Ruo-Zhen Zu,Wei-Ran Lin,Xiao-Ying Lin,Zi-xing Yan,You-mei Liu,Meng-jun Xu,Xiao-bin Zhang,Xiao-jing Zha,Jian-hua Yang,Zhen-wen Lin,Yan-hua Wu,Ruo-zhen Zu,Wei-ran Lin,Xiao-ying Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101278
IF: 3.577
2021-02-01
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and safety of retention enema with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for ulcerative colitis (UC) through a meta-analysis of published studies.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Literatures were retrieved from five electronic databases. Quality evaluation and meta-analysis were respectively conducted using the Cochrane collaboration and RevMan5.3. Overall quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE system. Effect sizes were pooled using random effect models.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Seventeen RCTs were included. Compared with routine pharmacotherapies (RPs), TCM enema exhibited a statistically significant difference in clinical efficacy and reduction of the recurrence rate. The results of qualitative description for other endpoints, such as improvements in anabrosis, ulcer, diarrhea, and hematochezia, suggested that TCM enema had better efficacy than RPs. Furthermore, the incidence of side effects in TCM was lower than that in RPs.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>This meta-analysis confirmed the efficacy and safety of TCM enema for improving UC symptoms. However, further well-designed researches are needed.</p>
integrative & complementary medicine