Abstract:Survival models incorporating random effects to account for unmeasured heterogeneity are being increasingly used in biostatistical and applied research. Specifically, unmeasured covariates whose lack of inclusion in the model would lead to biased, inefficient results are commonly modelled by including a subject-specific (or cluster-specific) frailty term that follows a given distribution (e.g. Gamma or log-Normal). Despite that, in the context of parametric frailty models little is known about the impact of misspecifying the baseline hazard, the frailty distribution, or both. Therefore, our aim is to quantify the impact of such misspecification in a wide variety of clinically plausible scenarios via Monte Carlo simulation, using open source software readily available to applied researchers. We generate clustered survival data assuming various baseline hazard functions, including mixture distributions with turning points, and assess the impact of sample size, variance of the frailty, baseline hazard function, and frailty distribution. Models compared include standard parametric distributions and more flexible spline-based approaches; we also included semiparametric Cox models. The resulting bias can be clinically relevant. In conclusion, we highlight the importance of fitting models that are flexible enough and the importance of assessing model fit. We illustrate our conclusions with two applications using data on diabetic retinopathy and bladder cancer. Our results show the importance of assessing model fit with respect to the baseline hazard function and the distribution of the frailty: misspecifying the former leads to biased relative and absolute risk estimates while misspecifying the latter affects absolute risk estimates and measures of heterogeneity.

A study on comparisons of additive regression frailty models to counter heterogeneity: Bayesian strategies and case study

Shared inverse Gaussian frailty models based on additive hazards

Generalised Lindley shared additive frailty regression model for bivariate survival data

Shared Frailty Models Based on Cancer Data

Investigating hospital heterogeneity with a competing risks frailty model

A comparative study with bootstrap resampling technique to uncover behavior of unconditional hazards and survival functions for gamma and inverse Gaussian frailty models

Some stochastic comparison results for frailty and resilience models

Correlated inverse Gaussian frailty models for bivariate survival data

On the Addams family of discrete frailty distributions for modeling multivariate case I interval-censored data

On the Addams family of discrete frailty distributions for modelling multivariate case I interval-censored data

CASE-CONTROL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS WITH A GENERAL SEMIPARAMETRIC SHARED FRAILTY MODEL - A PSEUDO FULL LIKELIHOOD APPROACH

Analysis of Bivariate Survival Data using Shared Inverse Gaussian Frailty Model

Dependent Dirichlet Processes for Analysis of a Generalized Shared Frailty Model

Impact of model misspecification in shared frailty survival models

Regression analysis of multivariate current status data under a varying coefficients additive hazards frailty model

Frailty Models for Pneumonia to Death with a Left‐censored Covariate

Effects of frailty in survival analysis

Generalizing the Frailty Assumptions in Survival Analysis

Dependent Dirichlet Processes for Analysis of aGeneralized Shared Frailty Model

Birnbaum–Saunders frailty regression models for clustered survival data

Parametric Analysis of Bivariate Current Status data with Competing risks using Frailty model