Abstract:Purpose Inspired by new findings on and perceptions of risk governance, such as the necessity of taking a broader perspective in coping with risks in companies and working together in interactive groups with various stakeholders to deal with complex risks in the modern world, the purpose of this paper is looking for new ways to deal with financial risks. Current methods dealing with those risks are confronted with the problems of being primarily based on past data and experience, neglecting the need for objectivity, focusing on the short-term future and disregarding the interconnectedness of different financial risk categories. Design/methodology/approach A literature review of risk governance, financial risk management and open foresight was executed to conceptualize solutions to the mentioned-above problems. Findings Collaborative financial risk assessment (CFRA) is a promising approach in financial risk governance with respect to overcoming said problems. It is a method of risk identification and assessment, which combines aspects of “open foresight” and the financial risk management and governance literature. CFRA is characterized as bringing together members of different companies in trying to detect weak signals and trends to gain knowledge about the future, which helps companies to reduce financial risks and increase the chance of gaining economic value. By overcoming organizational boundaries, individual companies may gain the knowledge they would probably not have without CFRA and achieve a competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications A conceptual paper like the one at hand wants empirical proof. Therefore, the authors developed a research agenda in the form of five propositions for further research. Originality/value This paper discusses the existing problems of financial risk identification and assessment methods. It contributes to the existing literature by proposing CFRA as a solution to those problems and adding a new perspective to financial risk governance.

Out of sight but still in mind: Developing an expectation for surprises by formalizing unknowledge in a contemporary risk‐assessment framework

Understanding the implications of low knowledge and high uncertainty in risk studies

Risk science applied to major risk events in history

From a false sense of safety to resilience under uncertainty

Risk Assessment with Broad Uncertainty and Knowledge Characterisation

Assumptions, uncertainty, and catastrophic/existential risk: National risk assessments need improved methods and stakeholder engagement

Anticipatory Thinking Challenges in Open Worlds: Risk Management

Democratising Risk: In Search of a Methodology to Study Existential Risk

Knowledge is power – conceptualizing collaborative financial risk assessment

Awareness of unawareness: A theory of decision making in the face of ignorance

Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Quantitative versus Qualitative Inputs to Analyst Risk Forecasts

False Choices and Black Boxes

How Uncertainty Matters Under Risk Neutrality

Big Bang, Low Bar -- Risk Assessment in the Public Arena

Answerable and Unanswerable Questions in Risk Analysis with Open-World Novelty

A psychological mechanism of surprise impacts risky decision making

Organisational resilience: Shifting from planning-driven business continuity management to anticipated improvisation.

A world full of surprises: bayesian theory of surprise to quantify degrees of uncertainty

A spotlight on boards’ response to the new risk environment: How boards are changing the way they think about risk in strategic decision making

Data‐driven predictive modeling in risk assessment: Challenges and directions for proper uncertainty representation

Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation