Inactivation of rat liver cytochrome P-450 by the suicide substrates parathion and chloramphenicol.

J. Halpert,R. A. Neal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/03602538108994031

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Assessing Catastrophes-Dragon-Kings, Black, and Gray Swans-for Science-Policy

Paolo F Ricci,Hua-Xia Sheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700021

2017-07-28

Abstract:The threat of catastrophic incidents-from nonroutine events to extreme ones, such as Dragon-Kings (DK), Black Swans (BS), and Gray Swans-induces precautionary initiatives that, before the fact, may encounter public resistance or after the fact recriminations. This study develops three aspects of these events: (1) generating mechanisms, (2) the statistical distributions of near and far-term consequences, and (3) the aggregation of expert opinions about assumptions, mechanisms, and consequences that informs science-policy. This study shows how causal analysis should account for the: (1) nonlinear catastrophic behaviors that generate predictions, (2) common and power-law distributions of the consequences, (3) self-organizing criticality and self-similarity, and (4) feedbacks and couplings between mechanisms that produce snaps, crackles, and pops as precursor, warning signals. The distribution of the consequences associated with catastrophic incidents has longer and fatter right tails than those expected from failure analysis based on known nonroutine events. DK are extreme events that deviate from these fat tail distributions, have a much higher frequency than expected, and can be predicted unlike BS. This shows how to combine divergent expert individual beliefs over assumptions, causation, and results, and a paradox that affects agreements obtained by majority rule.
A classification system for characterizing the integrity and quality of evidence in risk studies

Shital Thekdi,Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14153

Abstract:Risk management requires a balance between knowledge and values. Knowledge consists of justified beliefs and evidence, with evidence including data, assumptions, and models. While quality and integrity of evidence are valued in the sciences, risk science involves uncertainty, which suggests that evidence can be incomplete or imperfect. The use of inappropriate evidence can invalidate risk studies and contribute to misinformation and poor risk management decisions. Additionally, the interpretation of quality and integrity of evidence may vary by the risk study mission, decision-maker values, and stakeholder needs. While risk science has developed standards for risk studies, there remains a lack of clarity for how to demonstrate quality and integrity of evidence, recognizing that evidence can be presented in many formats (e.g., data, ideas, and theories), be leveraged at various stages of a risk study (e.g., hypotheses, analyses, and communication), and involve differing expectations across stakeholders. This study develops and presents a classification system to evaluate quality and integrity of evidence that is based on current risk science guidance, best practices from non-risk disciplines, and lessons learned from recent risk events. The classification system is demonstrated on a cyber-security application. This study will be of interest to risk researchers, risk professionals, and data analysts.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antibodies against glycoprotein gE of bovine herpesvirus 1 allows differentiation between infected and vaccinated cattle.

J. V. van Oirschot,M. Kaashoek,M. Maris-Veldhuis,K. Weerdmeester,F. Rijsewijk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(97)00073-6

IF: 2.623

1997-08-01

Journal of Virological Methods

Abstract:
A risk science perspective on the discussion concerning Safety I, Safety II and Safety III

Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108077

2022-01-01

Abstract:Recently, there has been a discussion in the safety science community concerning the validity of basic approaches to safety, referred to as Safety I, Safety II and Safety III, with Erik Hollnagel and Nancy Leveson in leading roles. The present paper seeks to obtain new knowledge concerning the issues raised, by adding a contemporary risk science perspective to the discussion. Risk is, to a limited degree, addressed in the literature presenting and studying these three approaches; however, as argued in the paper, the concept of risk and risk analysis and management principles and methods are highly relevant and useful for understanding the three safety approaches, deciding on their suitability, and eventually applying them. The paper underlines the importance of an integration of the safety and risk sciences, to further enhance concepts, approaches, principles, methods and models for understanding, assessing, communicating and managing system performance.

engineering, industrial,operations research & management science
Risk science and politics: What is and should be the relationship?

Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.16558

2024-07-31

Risk Analysis

Abstract:Risk science is the most updated and justified knowledge—in the form of concepts, principles, approaches, methods, and models—for understanding, assessing, characterizing, communicating, and handling risk, with applications. It is also about the practice that gives us this knowledge. It is commonly stated that risk science is politically neutral. This perspective article discusses this assertion by scrutinizing the relationship between risk science and politics. In particular, it looks into the position of The Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) on this matter. Using some current risk problems as illustrating examples, including COVID‐19 and climate change risk, the article argues that defending the political neutrality aim is paramount, especially with today's increasingly divisive political landscape.

public, environmental & occupational health,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,social sciences, mathematical methods
On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context

Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.016

IF: 6.392

2013-08-01

Safety Science

Abstract:In recent years there has been much focus on the so-called black swans in relation to risk management and decision making under uncertainty. A key issue has been the ability of risk assessment and probability theory to capture the black swans. In this paper we carry out an in-depth analysis of what a black swan means in relation to risk, uncertainty and probability: is a black swan just an extreme event with a very low probability or is it a more surprising event in some sense, for example an unknown unknown? We question how the black swans are linked to the risk concept, to expected values and probabilities, and to the common distinction between aleatory uncertainties and epistemic uncertainties. The main aim of this paper is to contribute to a clarification of the issue in order to strengthen the foundations of the meaning and characterisation of risk, and in this way provide a basis for improved risk management. The paper concludes that the black swan concept should be associated with a surprising extreme event relative to the present knowledge.

engineering, industrial,operations research & management science
Risk Management and Governance

Terje Aven,Ortwin Renn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13926-0

2010-01-01

Abstract:Risk is a popular topic in many sciences - in natural, medical, statistical, engineering, social, economic and legal disciplines. Yet, no single discipline can grasp the full meaning of risk. Investigating risk requires a multidisciplinary approach. The authors, coming from two very different disciplinary traditions, meet this challenge by building bridges between the engineering, the statistical and the social science perspectives. The book provides a comprehensive, accessible and concise guide to risk assessment, management and governance. It includes formal approaches to risk analysis without assuming a high level of mathematical proficiency but it also offers reflection and deliberation about the socio-political context in which risk issues are embedded. A basic pillar for the book is the risk governance framework proposed by the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC). This framework offers a comprehensive means of integrating risk identification, assessment, management and communication. The authors develop and explain new insights and add substance to the various elements of the framework. The theoretical analysis is illustrated by several examples from different areas of applications.
Forty Years of Risk Analysis: A Scientometric Overview

Floris Goerlandt,Jie Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13853

Abstract:Risk Analysis was first published in 1981, established with a vision to provide a platform for inquiry into fundamental risk-related concepts and theories, and to disseminate new knowledge about methods and approaches for identifying, analyzing, evaluating, managing, and communicating risk. The journal has also contributed significantly to a scientific understanding of specific risks related to human health and safety, engineering, ecological, and social systems. Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, the journal has become a leading platform over its 40-year history. Complementing recent celebratory overviews and perspectives on the evolution, achievements, and future challenges for Risk Analysis, this article presents a scientometric overview of the journal between 1981 and 2020. The study presents high-level insights in the journal publication trends and structure and trends in the leading countries/regions, institutions, and authors, in relation to their respective collaboration networks. Furthermore, the structure and evolution of research focus issues is analyzed, and highly cited publications are identified. The findings are primarily intended to provide high-level insights, which may be useful for early career academics and risk practitioners to understand the structure and development of the research domain, and its main contributors and topics, and for experienced researchers to reflect on the achievements and future developments.
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation

Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023

IF: 6.4

2016-08-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Risk assessment and management was established as a scientific field some 30–40 years ago. Principles and methods were developed for how to conceptualise, assess and manage risk. These principles and methods still represent to a large extent the foundation of this field today, but many advances have been made, linked to both the theoretical platform and practical models and procedures. The purpose of the present invited paper is to perform a review of these advances, with a special focus on the fundamental ideas and thinking on which these are based. We have looked for trends in perspectives and approaches, and we also reflect on where further development of the risk field is needed and should be encouraged. The paper is written for readers with different types of background, not only for experts on risk.

operations research & management science
A Multidisciplinary Review Into the Evolution of Risk Concepts and Their Assessment Methods

Yuanyuan Xu,Genserik Reniers,Ming Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112449

IF: 3.5

2024-11-06

Processes

Abstract:Risk is a complex and multi-faceted concept defined and addressed differently across disciplines. Recent years have seen a growing recognition of the need for a more comprehensive and integrated risk perspective combining insights from various disciplines. However, those works have rarely been analyzed in literature reviews. This article explores the possible way of advancing how we assess and manage risks by reviewing the theories, approaches, models, and other fundamental aspects of different disciplines relevant to risk concepts. Additionally, we compare the origins, connections, and differences between state-of-the-art risk science and risk concept research in various disciplines. Some suggestions and future directions are provided for improving risk assessment. This paper helps to deepen the understanding of the risk concept and advance the development of the risk management arena.

engineering, chemical
Risk Society and Science Education

Maurício Pietrocola,Ernani Rodrigues,Filipe Bercot,Samuel Schnorr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00176-w

2020-11-24

Science and Education

Abstract:The current COVID-19 pandemic raises reflection on the new roles of science education in citizen education in a world characterized by civilization risks, derived from the current socioeconomic development. This specific type of risk is treated as a manufactured risk as proposed by the sociologist Ulrich Beck. In this paper, we report a document analysis starting from Beck's risk society theory, followed by notions of reflexive modernity, risk perception, and the Cynefin decision-making model for complex problems. COVID-19 pandemic is characterized as a manufactured risk. We state that students are unable to deal with manufactured risk because of the type of problems they are usually prepared to solve at school and the limited risk perception they have. In order to acquire better science education, we propose the integration of <i>wicked</i> problems in science programs alongside the use of a multidimensional schema, the so-called <i>amplified risk perception space</i>, a tool to locate students' risk perception. We hope to contribute to prepare citizens for a world of global and complex events, such as the current pandemic.

education & educational research,history & philosophy of science
EVENT RISKS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ENTROPY SYSTEMS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13165/pspo-20-25-29

2020-01-01

Public Security and Public Order

Abstract:It is proposed to consider risk as an event category in the aspect of time, event and entropy scales in understanding their direction in relation to time, events and changes in the energy-entropics of the event system in the paper. A similar model for studying risks in any systems, not related to their probabilistic characteristics, is based on the concepts of catastrophe theory in the application at times on the time scale preceding the present time . Such a model can be easily represented in the form of a directed multilevel graph, the root directory of which displays one of the known bifurcations, at the moment of time , which turns into an accomplished event. The energy component of such an event in the form of its entropy gives an idea of the degree of reliability of the transition from uncertainty to a verified event. It is it that in the time interval illustrates the magnitude and direction of event risk that can lead to accidents and other undesirable events. It can be argued that the multiple uncertainty that precedes the accomplished certainty in time is the key to understanding event risk as an analytical category. Some examples show the methodology of using the theory of catastrophes in comparison with the time scales, events and entropy to study marketing risks associated with events that may occur.
Democratising Risk: In Search of a Methodology to Study Existential Risk

Carla Zoe Cremer,Luke Kemp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11214

2021-12-27

Abstract:Studying potential global catastrophes is vital. The high stakes of existential risk studies (ERS) necessitate serious scrutiny and self-reflection. We argue that existing approaches to studying existential risk are not yet fit for purpose, and perhaps even run the risk of increasing harm. We highlight general challenges in ERS: accommodating value pluralism, crafting precise definitions, developing comprehensive tools for risk assessment, dealing with uncertainty, and accounting for the dangers associated with taking exceptional actions to mitigate or prevent catastrophes. The most influential framework for ERS, the 'techno-utopian approach' (TUA), struggles with these issues and has a unique set of additional problems: it unnecessarily combines the study of longtermism and longtermist ethics with the study of extinction, relies on a non-representative moral worldview, uses ambiguous and inadequate definitions, fails to incorporate insights from risk assessment in relevant fields, chooses arbitrary categorisations of risk, and advocates for dangerous mitigation strategies. Its moral and empirical assumptions might be particularly vulnerable to securitisation and misuse. We suggest several key improvements: separating the study of extinction ethics (ethical implications of extinction) and existential ethics (the ethical implications of different societal forms), from the analysis of human extinction and global catastrophe; drawing on the latest developments in risk assessment literature; diversifying the field, and; democratising its policy recommendations.

General Economics
Risk literacy: Foundational issues and its connection to risk science

Terje Aven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14223

Abstract:A new research area is developing, risk literacy. The term "risk literacy" basically refers to one's ability to understand and evaluate risk, in order to support and make appropriate decisions. In this article, we discuss how risk literacy relates to risk analysis/science with its topics of risk fundamentals (concepts), risk understanding, risk assessments, risk characterizations, risk perception, risk communication, and risk handling (covering risk management, risk governance, and policies on risk). We question how issues and research topics addressed in risk literacy relate to risk analysis/science knowledge, particularly on risk understanding. The main conclusion of the article is that risk literacy addresses an important topic-from both a theoretical and a practical societal relevancy perspective-and brings the potential for many additional developments and further insights if the topic is better integrated with risk science knowledge more broadly.
False Choices and Black Boxes

Michael R. Powers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231153676.003.0013

2014-01-01

Abstract:In recent decades, governments, corporations, and ordinary citizens the world over have become more aware of the potential impact of extreme-event, or catastrophe, risks. Dramatic events such as the September 11 attacks (2001), the Indian Ocean tsunami (2004), and Hurricane Katrina (2005) continue to raise these issues in the public mind while sending researchers from various disciplines scrambling to explain and forecast the frequencies and severities of such events. However, the rarity of catastrophes means that relevant data for estimating expected loss frequencies and severities is sparse, leaving risk-assessment experts with a difficult statistical problem: how to make reasonable forecasts of insured catastrophe losses based upon few historical observations. This chapter considers two troublesome issues arising from the paucity of catastrophe data: (1) a tendency to oversimplify conclusions from scientific research; and (2) the use of “black-box” forecasts that are not subject to impartial scientific examination and validation.
TDDB in the presence of interface states: Implications for the PMOS reliability margin

T. Nigam,P. Peumans

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2008.4796814

2008-12-01

Abstract:The reduced voltage scaling parameter for PMOS TDDB at low voltages is a concern for ultra-thin gate oxides. We show that it is caused by a change in breakdown statistics due to additional interface defects generated by cold holes. This has important implications for product lifetime at low failure fractions and large areas.
Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield

P Slovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007041821623

Abstract:Risk management has become increasingly politicized and contentious. Polarized views, controversy, and conflict have become pervasive. Research has begun to provide a new perspective on this problem by demonstrating the complexity of the concept "risk" and the inadequacies of the traditional view of risk assessment as a purely scientific enterprise. This paper argues that danger is real, but risk is socially constructed. Risk assessment is inherently subjective and represents a blending of science and judgment with important psychological, social, cultural, and political factors. In addition, our social and democratic institutions, remarkable as they are in many respects, breed distrust in the risk arena. Whoever controls the definition of risk controls the rational solution to the problem at hand. If risk is defined one way, then one option will rise to the top as the most cost-effective or the safest or the best. If it is defined another way, perhaps incorporating qualitative characteristics and other contextual factors, one will likely get a different ordering of action solutions. Defining risk is thus an exercise in power. Scientific literacy and public education are important, but they are not central to risk controversies. The public is not irrational. Their judgments about risk are influenced by emotion and affect in a way that is both simple and sophisticated. The same holds true for scientists. Public views are also influenced by worldviews, ideologies, and values; so are scientists' views, particularly when they are working at the limits of their expertise. The limitations of risk science, the importance and difficulty of maintaining trust, and the complex, sociopolitical nature of risk point to the need for a new approach--one that focuses upon introducing more public participation into both risk assessment and risk decision making in order to make the decision process more democratic, improve the relevance and quality of technical analysis, and increase the legitimacy and public acceptance of the resulting decisions.
The Evolution Of Financial Risk Management

Tolga Murat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51410/jcgirm.9.1.10

2022-08-31

Abstract:Purpose: This paper aims to track the history of financial risk management and how this progress affected the evolution of financial risk management. In the first part of this paper, we will look at how risk is defined, the concept of risk management, and the transaction from risk philosophy to the risk culture. The second part examines the evolution of risk management and different models used in financial risk measurements, such as variance, covariance, standard deviation, and value at risk models. In the third part, the Bretton Woods system, its effects on the global financial system, and after the Bretton Woods system is studied. In the final cut, we conclude and present our recommendations for future studies. Methodology: This theoretical research will focus on the historical evolution of financial risk management and the financial tools used while measuring risk. The finance field has evolved with crises, technological developments, and globalization. While the finance field has been growing, how financial risks are defined, managed, and measured has also changed. In addition to these changes, the finance field was introduced with a new area called "blockchain" and new investment instruments called cryptocurrencies. Practical Implications: This theoretical research investigates the evolution of financial risk management from a historical perspective and argues that the current financial risk management tools are insufficient to project today's risks fully.

English Else
Mine the past: How to make better risk-based decisions and improve outcomes with historical threat data

Ann Pickren

2024-01-01

Abstract:The impact of every crisis has the potential to cascade throughout an organisation's operations, supply chain and market ecosystem. To properly understand and mitigate this ripple of dynamic risk, business continuity, security and risk management leaders need to know where to focus their attention. Looking at historical threat data provides a clearer picture of the risk landscape, helping leaders better anticipate and plan for the future. To date, however, there have been challenges in this process. As the volume of data about critical events continues to grow at an alarming rate, sifting manually through data puts organisations - and business continuity - in jeopardy. This paper discusses the value of historical threat data and innovations in data-mining technology that can unlock the true power of historical data for informed, strategic decision-making and better outcomes during a crisis.
The curse of the Black Swan

John Mueller,Mark G. Stewart

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1216007

2016-08-09

Journal of Risk Research

Abstract:When unexpected and emotion-engaging events become Black Swans and carry an ‘extreme impact,’ this derives not so much those qualities or from their intrinsic size or importance as from reaction, or overreaction, they generate; but one that is often as extreme and unpredictable as the event itself. Most consequential development in human history, however, stems not from such events, but from changes in thinking and behavior that are gradual and often little-noticed as they occur. In addition, when an unexpected, emotion-grabbing event becomes a Black Swan, the response is likely to become internalized, and getting people to re-evaluate through sensible risk analysis and risk communication is extremely difficult. As part of this, events that are aberrations are often unwisely taken instead to be harbingers – and continue to be so even in the face of repeated disconfirming evidence. An examination of the 9/11 response in the US illustrates these points.

social sciences, interdisciplinary

Inactivation of rat liver cytochrome P-450 by the suicide substrates parathion and chloramphenicol.

Assessing Catastrophes-Dragon-Kings, Black, and Gray Swans-for Science-Policy

A classification system for characterizing the integrity and quality of evidence in risk studies

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antibodies against glycoprotein gE of bovine herpesvirus 1 allows differentiation between infected and vaccinated cattle.

A risk science perspective on the discussion concerning Safety I, Safety II and Safety III

Risk science and politics: What is and should be the relationship?

On the meaning of a black swan in a risk context

Risk Management and Governance

Forty Years of Risk Analysis: A Scientometric Overview

Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation

A Multidisciplinary Review Into the Evolution of Risk Concepts and Their Assessment Methods

Risk Society and Science Education

EVENT RISKS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF ENTROPY SYSTEMS

Democratising Risk: In Search of a Methodology to Study Existential Risk

Risk literacy: Foundational issues and its connection to risk science

False Choices and Black Boxes

TDDB in the presence of interface states: Implications for the PMOS reliability margin

Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield

The Evolution Of Financial Risk Management

Mine the past: How to make better risk-based decisions and improve outcomes with historical threat data

The curse of the Black Swan