Abstract:Burst fracture which tends to occur between T9 and L5 level is usually caused by a high-energy axial load such as motor vehicle accidents and falls, in which the margins of the vertebral body spread out in all directions making the spine much less stable than a compression fracture. The bone chips which spread out toward the spinal cord could bruise the spinal cord causing neurologic injury. There are more than 25,000 thoracolumbar burst fracture cases every year in the United States. Typical lumbar burst fracture can lead paralysis of the legs and loss of control of the bowel and bladder. In a mild burst fractures only partial paralysis or transient neurologic symptoms may be present. Surgical treatment is required when the burst fracture is unstable. The aim of the surgery is to reach adequate decompression and stabilization. The most popular technique is posterior approach, but there are many complications, including instrumentation failure, pseudarthrosis and so forth1-4. Adequate anterior column support is necessary to prevent instrumentation failure5, 6. An anterior approach is effective for lumbar burst fractures with neural injury because it allows direct decompression and reconstruction7, 8. Anterior technique has been shown to have better reconstruction, better restoration, fewer complications and less operating time9-12. What's more, anterior approach is strongly considered in the setting of unstable burst fracture at L2-L5 level because of the importance of biomechanical integrity and sagittal profile here11, 13. However, the extensive operative trauma and high technical requirements of anterior surgery limit its wide application. From the year 2000, we investigated a series of improvements in this procedure. A 32-year-old man fell from a height of 4 m 3 h prior to presenting with pain in his low back, difficult in urination and defecation and limitations in lower extremity activity. Careful physical examination showed tenderness and sensitivity to percussion at the L3 spinous process. Decreased sensation was found over both lower extremities. The knee jerk and Achilles tendon reflexes were decreased and muscle strength in the two extremities (knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) was grade 3+. Routine laboratory investigations were normal. X-ray films revealed a burst fracture of L3. CT and MR scans showed that more than 50% of the vertebral canal was occupied by bone chips at the L3 level. Therefore, the preoperative diagnosis was L3 burst fracture (AO type A3) with cauda equina syndrome and incomplete paralysis of the lower extremities. Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with an expandable artificial vertebral body (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland) was planned. After induction of general anesthesia, the patient was positioned in a right lateral decubitus position. A transverse incision was made at the L3 level between the left anterior and posterior axillary lines and the external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdominal muscles bluntly separated. Next, the prevertebral fascia was exposed through the retroperitoneal space. After the L3 level had been confirmed fluoroscopically, a Synframe Retractor System (Synthes)14 was installed and four Hoffman retractors placed on the proximal and distal vertebrae to create a stable surgical field15. Before performing corpectomy, the L3 segmental vertebral vessel was carefully ligatured and electrocoagulated. A routine corpectomy was then carried out and the spinal canal carefully decompressed. After both ends of the vertebral endplates had been scraped appropriately, an appropriately sized expandable artificial vertebral body with autogenous bone was inserted into the intervertebral space. The cage was then unfolded to achieve reduction. After the position of the cage had been confirmed fluoroscopically, the cage was fixed with a VentroFix System (Synthes). The operation time was 90 min with an estimated blood loss of 300 mL. The incision length was 6.5 cm and the duration of hospitalization 7 days. Compared with traditional anterior surgery16, only one rather than three levels of segmental vessels are severed in this improved procedure. Two Cobb elevators are used to press the segmental artery before cutting it, after which the two vessel ends are sufficiently dissociated before ligaturing (proximal part) or electrocoagulating (distal part) them. The integrity of the psoas is preserved thanks to the use of Hoffman retractors. The external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdominal muscles are bluntly separated rather than being severed, thus the improved procedure is less invasive. The Synframe Retractor System14 offers a more stable operative field with a smaller skin incision and thus decreases the risks of vessel and organ injury during the procedure. This technique makes decompression of the spinal canal more direct and complete17. The expandable artificial vertebral body18 makes the reconstruction more effective and offers much stronger and more stable support19, which likely results in higher fusion rates and reduced rate of instrument failure compared with the traditional technique. In our experience, a satisfactory clinical outcome can be achieved by this technique. Additional video images may be found in the online version of this article. Visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/os.12178/suppinfo Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Prophylaktische lumbale Liquordrainage verbessert Outcomes nach SAB

Effect of the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis

Single Institution Experience with Lumbar Drainage and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Feasibility of Prompt Lumbar Drainage in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Clearance of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from the Cerebrospinal Fluid in Computational and In Vitro Models

Lumbar continuous drain of cerebrospinal fluid for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a Meta-analysis

Early complications and outcome after treatment of ruptured aneurysms in patients suffering from subarachnoid hemorrhage - a post-hoc analysis of the Earlydrain trial

Anterior Decompression and Reconstruction for Lumbar Burst Fractures

Analysis of Cerebral Spinal Fluid Drainage and Intracranial Pressure Peaks in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

The Effectiveness of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Different Bleeding Amounts

Role of clipping in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a post hoc analysis of the Earlydrain trial

Outcome after Interdisciplinary Treatment for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-A Single Center Experience

[Efficacy of Early Consecutive Lumbar Puncture Treatment in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage after Embolization].

Value of lumbar subarachnoid drainage in refractory cerebrospinal fluid leakage following removal of spinal tumors

Prevention of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage—Summary of Existing Clinical Evidence

Sekundärprävention von Ösophagusvarizenblutungen verlängert Überleben

Neuroradiological diagnosis and therapy of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhageNeuroradiologische Diagnostik und Therapie von zerebralen Vasospasmen nach Subarachnoidalblutung

Results of adjunctive spinal drainage and/or left subclavian artery bypass in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Splenic rupture following prone lateral discectomy and arthrodesis: illustrative case

Abstract 114: LACROSSE Trial: Lumbar Drainage Compared to External Ventricular Drainage in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, a Randomized Control Trial

Ligation of Cervical Lymphatic Vessels Decelerates Blood Clearance and Worsens Outcomes after Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage