Abstract:BACKGROUND:Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common types of intracranial haematoma, and often occurs in older people. Burr-hole craniostomy, which is an evacuation through one or two burr holes drilled over the site of the haematoma, has been widely accepted as the most effective way to manage CSDH. Recurrences are a major problem and need reoperation, sometimes repeatedly. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects and safety of the use of external drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. SEARCH METHODS:We ran our first search on 27 November 2014. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase Classic+Embase (OvidSP), PubMed, ISI WOS (SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, CPCI-S and CPSI-SSH), Chinese databases, and clinical trials registers, and screened reference lists. In compliance with the MECIR conduct standard 37, the Cochrane Injuries Group Information Specialist ran an update search within 12 months of publication (25 April 2016). We have screened these results but not incorporated the findings into the current review; as a result of the update search, one trial is awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared external subdural drains with no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of CSDH in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Two review authors identified potential articles from the literature search, extracted data independently using a data extraction form and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. For dichotomous data, where statistical heterogeneity was low, we calculated summary risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals using a fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS:Nine RCTs, including a total of 968 participants, reported outcomes specified by this review. Only one RCT reported the use of an adequate method of allocation concealment; this trial was a large, single-centre, high quality study and was adequately reported. All included trials reported a reduced recurrence of CSDH with external subdural drains. We found a significant reduction in the risk of recurrence with subdural drains (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.61, I(2) = 38%; 9 studies, 968 participants; moderate-quality evidence). There was no strong evidence of any increase in complications (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.72, I(2) = 0%; 7 studies, 710 participants; low-quality evidence), mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33, I(2) = 22%; 5 studies, 539 participants; low-quality evidence), or poor functional outcome (which included deaths) (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.05, I(2) = 31%; 5 studies, 490 participants; low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:There is some evidence that postoperative drainage is effective in reducing the symptomatic recurrence of CSDH. Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Due to the low quality of the evidence for the secondary outcomes, the effect of drainage on the occurrence of surgical complications, mortality and poor functional outcome is uncertain. This uncertainty can be clarified with data from high-quality studies which may be conducted in the future. There is no strong evidence of any increase in complications when drains are used.

Value of lumbar subarachnoid drainage in refractory cerebrospinal fluid leakage following removal of spinal tumors

Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after spinal operation

A Comparison of Subperiosteal or Subgaleal Drainage with Subdural Drainage on the Outcomes of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

Contralateral Subdural Effusion after Decompressive Craniectomy: What is the Optimal Treatment?

The Comparison Between Surgical Procedure and Conservative Treatment in the Management of Traumatic Subdural Effusion

Clinical evaluation of performing subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid drainage in the treatment of pseudomeningoceles

External drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults.

Continuous lumbar cistern drainage for treatment of cerebrospinal lfuid leakage after neck tumor surgery

Effect of the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis

Causes Prevention and Treatment for Cerebrospinal Leak after Lumbar Revision Surgery

Treatment and Prevention of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage after Craniofacial Surgery for Tumors Involving the Skull Base

The effect of neuroendoscopic transnasal dural suturing combined with multi-layer skull base reconstruction in the treatment of high-flow cerebrospinal fluid leakage

Surgical Treatment of Intradural-Extramedullary Schwannomas and Management of Cerebrospinai Fluid Leakage after Operation

Continued lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in surgery for intracranial aneurysms

Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Spine Surgery

Lumbar continuous drain of cerebrospinal fluid for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a Meta-analysis

Intentional Dural Resection during en bloc Spinal Resection Could Provide a Secure Surgical Margin for Patients with Recurrent Spinal Tumors

Effects of different drainage methods on the prognosis of patients with intracranial aneurysms after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Experience on Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage after Craniocerebral Operation

Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Lumbar Drain in Endoscopic Skull Base Tumor Resection: A Meta-Analysis.

Risk factors and management strategies for cerebrospinal fluid leakage following lumbar posterior surgery