Abstract:Purpose Many emerging economy firms are under foreign owners' pressure to embrace the challenges of addressing corporate social responsibility (CSR) and consider adopting sustainability initiatives. However, it is not clear how foreign ownership plays a role to enable or inhibit these emerging economy firms from translating sustainability initiatives into improved financial performance. Utilizing neo-institutional theory, the authors argue that emerging economy firms that voluntarily report sustainability gain legitimacy in the eyes of shareholders and improve stock market performance. However, emerging economy firms may not have the resources to reconcile the internal stakeholders' various legitimacy requirements to promote sustainability practices, resulting in a negative association with accounting performance. Foreign ownership attenuates the relationship between sustainability reporting and firm performance due to the different legitimacy requirements in foreign markets. Design/methodology/approach To test the study's hypotheses, the authors collected and analyzed a large sample of publicly listed firms between 2010 and 2016 in Taiwan where the types of foreign ownership include foreign trust funds, foreign financial institutions and other foreign legal entities. Regression analyses were conducted to investigate whether the firms that report their sustainable practices have better financial performance, including stock market performance and accounting performance. Additionally, a three-step procedure was employed to address the endogeneity issue with a binary explanatory variable. Findings The positive stock market reaction to the emerging economy firms' voluntary sustainability reporting supports legitimacy gained among investors. By contrast, sustainability reporting has a negative association with accounting performance due to the difficulty of reconciling different legitimacy requirements among various stakeholders in emerging economies. Further, foreign ownership, particularly the trust fund, exhibits a negative moderating effect on the relationship between sustainability reporting in aligning corporate practices with sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the company's stock market performance. Originality/value By examining the less tested contingent role played by foreign ownership in the emerging economy firms' sustainability reporting, the authors provide insights into the influence exerted by different types of foreign ownership on firms' financial performances beyond previous studies that focus on family ownership, state ownership, or managerial ownership in emerging economies. The findings shed light on corporate sustainability strategy and foreign direct investment policies for an emerging economy.

Seeking legitimacy? "Ownerless" companies and environmental performance

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Corporate environmental responsibility in China: a strategic political perspective

The Influence of Legitimacy on a Proactive Green Orientation and Green Performance: A Study Based on Transitional Economy Scenarios in China

The cost of foreign ownership: Voluntary sustainability reporting and financial performance in an emerging economy

Profit or Legitimacy? What Drives Firms to Prioritize Social Stakeholders?

Sincerity or hypocrisy: can green M&A achieve corporate environmental governance?

Social trust and environmental performance in China: Does state ownership matter?

Do state-owned enterprises really have better environmental performance in China? Environmental regulation and corporate environmental strategies

CEO Experience and Enterprise Environment, Social and Governance Performance: Evidence from China

Why Firms Perform Differently in Corporate Social Responsibility? Firm Ownership and the Persistence of Organizational Imprints

Does environmental responsibility matter in cross-sector partnership formation? A legitimacy perspective

Executive Overconfidence and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance

Does a Company's Position within the Interlocking Director Network Influence Its ESG Performance?—Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Does voluntary environmental regulation stimulate corporate green innovation efficiency? An empirical study from China's A-share listed companies

Beyond Market Strategies: How Multiple Decision-Maker Groups Jointly Influence Underperforming Firms’ Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility

Promoting or Inhibiting? The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Financial Performance—An Empirical Analysis Based on China

Does Enterprise Internal Control Improve Environmental Performance—Empirical Evidence from China

The drivers of corporate environment inputs: Based on neo-institution theory evidence from Chinese listed biological and other companies

How does command-and-control environmental regulation impact firm value? A study based on ESG perspective

Listed Local State-Owned Enterprises and Environmental Performance: Evidence from China