Abstract:Prosthetic joint replacement surgery is performed with increasing frequency. Overall the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and subsequently prosthesis revision failure is estimated to be between 1 and 3%. Differentiating infection from aseptic mechanical loosening, which is the most common cause of prosthetic failure, is especially important because of different types of therapeutic management. Despite a thorough patient history, physical examination, multiple diagnostic tests and complex algorithms, differentiating PJI from aseptic loosening remains challenging. Among imaging modalities, radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific and cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, are limited by hardware-induced artefacts. Radionuclide imaging reflects functional rather than anatomical changes and is not hampered by the presence of a metallic joint prosthesis. As a result scintigraphy is currently the modality of choice in the investigation of suspected PJI. Unfortunately, there is no true consensus about the gold standard technique since there are several drawbacks and limitations inherent to each modality. Bone scintigraphy (BS) is sensitive for identifying the failed joint replacement, but cannot differentiate between infection and aseptic loosening. Combined bone/gallium scintigraphy (BS/GS) offers modest improvement over BS alone for diagnosing PJI. However, due to a number of drawbacks, BS/GS has generally been superseded by other techniques but it still may have a role in neutropenic patients. Radiolabelled leucocyte scintigraphy remains the gold standard technique for diagnosing neutrophil-mediated processes. It seems to be that combined in vitro labelled leucocyte/bone marrow scintigraphy (LS/BMS), with an accuracy of about 90%, is currently the imaging modality of choice for diagnosing PJI. There are, however, significant limitations using in vitro labelled leucocytes and considerable effort has been devoted to developing alternative radiotracers, such as radiolabelled HIGs, liposomes, antigranulocyte antibodies and fragments, as well as more investigational tracers such as radiolabelled antibiotics, antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages and thymidine kinase. On the other hand, positron emission tomography (PET) is still growing in the field of PJI imaging with radiotracers such as (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), (18)F-FDG white blood cells and (18)F-fluoride. But unfortunately this superb tomographic technique will only receive full acceptance when specific PET uptake patterns can be successfully developed. The emergence of hybrid modality imaging using integrated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and PET with computed tomography (SPECT/CT and PET/CT) may also have a contributing role for more accurate assessment of joint replacement complications, especially combined with new radiotracers such as (68)Ga and (64)Cu. Finally, in searching for infection-specific tracers, currently there is no such diagnostic agent available.

Editorial on the validity of plain radiographs in low-grade periprosthetic hip infections

Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of plain radiographs for periprosthetic joint infections of the hip: a literature review

Diagnosing periprosthetic hip joint infection with new-generation 0.55 T MRI

Clinical significance of triple-phase bone scintigraphy in diagnosing peri-prosthetic infection following hip arthroplasty

The Role of Imaging Techniques to Define a Peri-Prosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infection: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statements

The Use of Nuclear Imaging for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection after Knee and Hip Arthroplasties

Should We Wait for Bone-on-Bone Arthritis? Equivalent Clinical Outcomes in Patients Requiring Advanced Imaging Prior to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

99Tcm-MDP imaging for the diagnosis of joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients with Osteoarthritis Secondary to Hip Pyogenic Infection.

Inflammatory response in 85 patients with loosened hip prostheses: A prospective study comparing inflammatory markers in patients with aseptic and septic prosthetic loosening

Plain Radiography Findings to Predict Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Limitations of Gram Staining for the Diagnosis of Infections Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty

Differentiation between peri-prosthetic infection and aseptic loosening using quantitative analysis of triphasic 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy

Differentiation of peri-prosthetic infection and aseptic loosening using quantitative analysis with Tc99m-MDP triple-phase bone scintigraphy

MRI Findings of Common Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty

The role of MRI in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty

Which factors are associated with a successful outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients with early radiographic osteoarthritis?

Radiographic signs and hip pain 5 years after THA with a cemented stem predict future revision for aseptic loosening: a prospective cohort study

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone Remodeling Around Osseointegration Implants among Transfemoral Amputees.

Periprosthetic joint infection in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision