Abstract:Background: The severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA) as demonstrated by preoperative radiographs and patient-reported pain plays an important role in the indication for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). In hip and knee research, data about the effect of the severity of preoperative radiographic OA on the outcome of total joint arthroplasty have been mixed. For shoulder replacement, we are unsure of the effects of radiographic severity on outcomes. Questions/purposes: This study investigated whether the preoperative radiographic severity of glenohumeral OA is associated with improvement in pain and function after aTSA. We asked, (1) does the severity of glenohumeral OA correlate with improvement in patient-reported outcomes after TSA (delta American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score [postoperative-preoperative], delta Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, delta Simple Shoulder Test, and delta VAS)? (2) Is having mild osteoarthritis associated with not meeting the minimum clinically important differences in preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores? Methods: An institutional query of patients who underwent aTSA for OA was performed between January 2015 and December 2018. A total of 1035 patients were eligible; however, only patients with adequate preoperative radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were included. Patients with proximal humerus fractures, inflammatory arthropathy, cuff tear arthropathy, prior ipsilateral rotator cuff repair, brachial plexus injury or neuromuscular disorder, workers compensation, periprosthetic joint infection, or revision surgery within 2 years were excluded. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and prior shoulder surgery were recorded. The severity of OA was classified based on the modified Samilson-Prieto and Walch classification. The association between Samilson-Prieto grade and patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and VAS score) was evaluated. Radiographic characteristics, patient demographics, comorbidities, and prior surgery were also evaluated for the potential risk of not achieving improvement in the minimum clinically important difference (16.1) with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score is scored 0 to 100, with higher scores representing less pain and better function. A total of 206 patients (20% of those eligible) with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years were included. Twenty-three patients had Samilson-Prieto Grade I, 38 had Grade II, 57 had Grade III, and 88 had Grade IV. Results: There were no differences in improvements (delta) between the groups and between patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test, and VAS). Compared with patients with more severe osteoarthritis (Samilson-Prieto Grades II, III, and IV), a higher proportion of patients with less severe osteoarthritis (Grade I) did not exceed the minimum clinical important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (22% [five of 23] versus 4% [seven of 183]; odds ratio 0.14 [95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.520]; p = 0.006). Conclusion: The improvement in patient-reported outcome measure scores was similar regardless of radiographic severity after aTSA. Surgeons should use caution when recommending surgery to patients with less severe OA because a higher percentage did not improve, based on the minimum clinically important difference. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Should We Wait for Bone-on-Bone Arthritis? Equivalent Clinical Outcomes in Patients Requiring Advanced Imaging Prior to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Which factors are associated with a successful outcome following total hip arthroplasty in patients with early radiographic osteoarthritis?

Severity Of Radiographic Osteoarthritis: Association with Improved Patient Reported Outcomes Following Knee Arthroplasty

Patients With Mild Osteoarthritis Are Less Likely to Achieve a Clinically Important Improvement in Pain or Function After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Comparison of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty in hip fracture versus elective cases in patients over 60 years of age

Effect of Patient Age on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes in Patients Who Have Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Compared to Patients Who Have Hip Osteoarthritis

Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures vs. osteoarthritis at one year follow up-A comparative, retrospective study

Functional Outcome Scores and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Patients With Tönnis Grade 1 Versus Grade 0 Arthritis: A Propensity-Matched Study at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

The influence of pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis on functional outcome after trochanteric fracture

Comparing Patient Outcomes After THA and TKA: Is There a Difference?

Comparison of short-term outcomes of anterolateral supine approach and posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: adjusting for demographic influences

Hip Preservation or Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Case-Control Study of Factors Influencing Arthroplasty Decision-Making for Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in China

Outcomes in patients with rheumatoid versus osteoarthritis for total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Radiologically Guided Versus Blinded Intra-articular Injection in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Long-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: a systematic review of the contemporary literature

Midterm-clinical Outcomes after Hip Arthroscopy in Middle-aged Patients with Early Osteoarthritis

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

[Imaging Features of Hip Joint in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty].

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 2023 Update

Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes and Spino-pelvic Parameters after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis of the Hip Compared to Osteoarthritis: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study