Abstract:Adjacency relationships are pervasive in forest planning problems, especially the ones related to the selection of habitat networks for biodiversity conservation. Two main approaches are applied in the planning of these conservation actions: i) selection grounded on the island biogeography theory, where connected habitats are preferred and ii) selection grounded in the habitat amount hypothesis, where the amount of habitat is enforced in local landscapes, regardless of their spatial distribution. Because the presence of connectivity requirements in the creation of habitat networks impose more stringent limitations on the search for optimal solutions, they are expected to cascade to the total benefit from harvesting revenues and, consequently, to the costs of the habitat networks. The ecological implications of these approaches have been investigated, whereas the economic consequences of imposing connectivity remain unclear. Here, I address this issue and investigate the costs of selecting habitat networks in multiple forest landscapes in central Europe, applying these two approaches. To this end, a conic optimization model is proposed, to find minimum cost allocations of forest reserves. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis on the optimal allocation is conducted, regarding the size of the habitat network required and the level of heterogeneity in forest profitability within the landscapes. The results show that habitat networks amounting to 10% of the forest area may be created with up to 5.5% reduction in the total Net Present Value (NPV), with a higher cost when connectivity is imposed (6.5%). The cost of connectivity, however, may increase in landscapes with high heterogeneity in forest profitability and with the minimum amount of habitat required. In conclusion, habitat selection must be tailored to local conditions and weight the additional costs of imposing connectivity against the requirements of the target species and the expected ecological benefits.

The costs of flexible sale of reserves

Cost-effective policy instruments for biodiversity conservation under climate change – The need for flexibility

Costs of expanding the network of protected areas as a response to climate change in the Cape Floristic Region

Smart spatial incentives for market-based conservation

Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation

Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Modelling trade offs between public and private conservation policies

CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES

Modeling Opportunity Costs of Conservation in Transitional Landscapes

Conserving metapopulations in human-altered landscapes at the urban–rural fringe

Stay by thy neighbor? Social organization determines the efficiency of biodiversity markets with spatial incentives

Climate and land-use changes reduce the benefits of terrestrial protected areas

Options for National Parks and Reserves for Adapting to Climate Change

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns

The Policy Implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land Use Change and Biodiversity

Effects of profit-driven cropland expansion and conservation policies

Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting

Assessing the Distribution and Protection Status of two Types of Cool Environment to Facilitate Their Conservation under Climate Change

Forest clearances, compensatory afforestation and biodiversity offsetting in forests: Balancing flexibility and equivalency in Switzerland

Past and predicted future effects of housing growth on open space conservation opportunity areas and habitat connectivity around National Wildlife Refuges

Habitat amount and connectivity in forest planning models: Consequences for profitability and compensation schemes