Abstract:Recovery of grassland birds in agricultural landscapes is a global imperative. Agricultural landscapes are complex, and the value of resource patches may vary substantially among species. The spatial extent at which landscape features affect populations (i.e., scale of effect) may also differ among species. There is a need for regional-scale conservation planning that considers landscape-scale and species-specific responses of grassland birds to environmental change. We developed a spatially explicit approach to optimizing grassland conservation in the context of species-specific landscapes and prioritization of species recovery and applied it to a conservation program in Kentucky (USA). We used a hierarchical distance-sampling model with an embedded scale of effect predictor to estimate the relationship between landscape structure and abundance of eastern meadowlarks (Sturnella magna), field sparrows (Spizella pusilla), and northern bobwhites (Colinus virginianus). We used a novel spatially explicit optimization procedure rooted in multi-attribute utility theory to design alternative conservation strategies (e.g., prioritize only northern bobwhite recovery or assign equal weight to each species' recovery). Eastern meadowlarks and field sparrows were more likely to respond to landscape-scale resource patch adjacencies than landscape-scale patch densities. Northern bobwhite responded to both landscape-scale resource patch adjacencies and densities and responded strongly to increased grassland density. Effects of landscape features on local abundance decreased as distance increased and had negligible influence at 0.8 km for eastern meadowlarks (0.7-1.2 km 95% Bayesian credibility intervals [BCI]), 2.5 km for field sparrows (1.5-5.8 km 95% BCI), and 8.4 km for bobwhite (6.4-26 km 95% BCI). Northern bobwhites were predicted to benefit greatly from future grassland conservation regardless of conservation priorities, but eastern meadowlark and field sparrow were not. Our results suggest similar species can respond differently to broad-scale conservation practices because of species-specific, distance-dependent relationships with landscape structure. Our framework is quantitative, conceptually simple, customizable, and predictive and can be used to optimize conservation in heterogeneous ecosystems while considering landscape-scale processes and explicit prioritization of species recovery.

Conserving metapopulations in human-altered landscapes at the urban–rural fringe

Systematic landscape restoration in the rural–urban fringe: meeting conservation planning and policy goals

Prioritizing Habitat Conservation Outside Protected Areas in Rapidly Urbanizing Landscapes: A Patch Network Approach

CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES

Optimizing conservation in species-specific agricultural landscapes

Are wetland regulations cost effective for species protection? A case study of amphibian metapopulations

Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking

Metapopulations revisited: the area-dependence of dispersal matters.

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns

Optimizing conservation planning for multiple cohabiting species

Incorporating spatio-temporal connectivity for prioritized conservation of individual habitat patches in a dynamic landscape

The role of spatial structure in at-risk metapopulation recoveries

Diverse land uses and connectivity allow urban wildlife populations to meet minimum area requirements

Can Policy Maintain Habitat Connectivity under Landscape Fragmentation? A Case Study of Shenzhen, China.

Biodiversity at disequilibrium: updating conservation strategies in cities

Modelling trade offs between public and private conservation policies

Spatial Conservation Prioritization for Land in Megacity Facing Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss

Incorporating a Distance Cost in Systematic Reserve Design.

The long shadow of woody encroachment: An integrated approach to modeling grassland songbird habitat

Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people

Influences of Habitat Destruction with Spatially Structure on Metapopulation Persistence