Abstract:An increasing number of newly formed impact craters on Mars have been detected in the last 15 years. These small craters are normally identified via dark spots in lower resolution images that formed during the impact process, presumably through the removal or disturbance of bright surface material [1]. Later higher resolution images revealed single craters or crater clusters, which form when impactors fragment in the atmosphere, within those halos [1,2]. Due to this detection method, most of the new impact sites found are in dusty regions, which imposes an observational bias [3]. Newly formed clusters consist of two to thousands of individual craters and can be tightly clustered or spread out over hundreds of meters [2]. Since the InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) mission landed on Mars in 2018 [4], the search for newly formed impact craters has become even more important, because identifying impacts in seismic signals could provide further constraints on both the atmospheric and solid-body effects of impact cratering process on Mars, as well as help place further constraints on the properties of the uppermost layer of the crust. As one of InSight&#8217;s mission goals is to estimate the current impact rate on Mars, the seismic detection of impacts is also crucial [4]. The aim of this new study is to describe the properties of the complete catalog of known newly formed craters on Mars and examine correlations between different crater cluster properties. We investigated 559 crater clusters and 493 single craters detected between 2008 and 2020 using 25 cm/px HiRISE images. The locations and diameters were noted for each single crater, as well as for every individual crater within a cluster down to 1 m diameter. This was done using ArcMap (ArcGIS) software with the three-point method of the CraterTools add-in [5]. We describe the cluster characteristics, such as the number of craters within a cluster, largest crater in a cluster, cluster effective diameter, cluster dispersion, elevation of the impact sites, and the variation in sizes of craters within a cluster. More than half of the new impact sites form as clusters. We did not find any differences between the spatial distribution of single and crater clusters across Mars. The mapped crater clusters from this study consist of 2 to 2334 individual craters. More than half of all clusters (58%) consist of 10 craters or less. Crater clusters containing more than 100 craters are rare. With regard to the sizes of craters within crater clusters, we found that for highly populated clusters, the majority of craters are very small, and clusters with few craters have a tendency for craters that are more equal in size. Clusters having large effective diameters contain more equally sized craters. Our results show the full range of parameter spaces that are possible for cluster properties, which can help validate theoretical atmospheric fragmentation models. References: [1] Malin M. C. et al. (2006) Science, 314, 1573-1577. [2] Daubar I. J. et al. (2019) JGR, 124, 958-969. [3] Daubar I. J. et al. (2013) Icarus, 225, 506-516. [4] Banerdt B. W. et al. (2020) Nature, 13, 183-189. [5] Kneissl T. et al. (2011) Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1243-1254.

Aouelloul impact crater, Mauritania: New structural, lithological, and petrographic data

An Impact Crater in Palm Valley, Central Australia?

Shock petrographic and numerical modeling constraints on the morphology and size of the Morokweng impact structure, South Africa

Araguainha impact structure, Brazil: New insights into the geology of the central uplift

Origin of a polymict, mega‐clast‐bearing impact breccia in the crater floor of Wetumpka Impact Structure, Elmore County, Alabama: Insights from surface outcrops and a drill core

Changes in thermomagnetic and X-ray diffraction properties of Asby dolerite with distance from the Lockne impact structure, Sweden

Proposed Miami Impact Crater Identified as a Solutional Doline of Oolictic Limestone

Formation of the Lawn Hill Impact Structure

Shocked quartzite clasts with transverse fractures from Araguainha impact structure, Brazil

The probable direction of impact at Dhala impact structure, India deciphered from microfracture intensity and X-ray diffractometry: a new potential impact direction indicator

Melt breccias in parautochthonous basement rocks of the Morokweng impact structure, South Africa – Evidence for a friction origin

Zircon U‐Pb provenance analysis of impact melt and target rocks from the Rochechouart impact structure, France

Clues on the Australasian impact crater site inferred from detailed mineralogical study of a monazite inclusion in a Muong Nong tektite

Imaging the Mahout structure at the Oman desert with the aid of geophysical observations

Impact Crater with Traces of Tectonic Deformation in the South Polar Region of the Moon

Crater morphology in sandstone targets: The MEMIN impact parameter study

Updated statistics for crater clusters on Mars

Spectroscopic Characterizations of Sand Dunes Minerals of El-Oued (Northeast Algerian Sahara) by FTIR, XRF and XRD Analyses

An olivine cumulate outcrop on the floor of Jezero crater, Mars

Ambient Noise Tomography Reveals Asymmetric Impact Damage Zone Beneath Lonar Crater, India: Implications for Oblique Impact Cratering in Heterogeneous Basalt, With Planetary Applications

Petrographic and geochemical study of Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks in the western Anti-Atlas belt, Morocco: Facies, weathering, provenance and economic exploitation