Abstract:Transaction cost economics (TCE) is probably the most widely accepted theory on how firms can gain competitive advantage through efficient organization of their economic transactions. However, by focusing on the competitive environment in which companies operate, it abstracts from the cultural context in which governance decisions are made. We study the cultural boundedness of TCE using two seminal cultural theories: the political science/sociology framework of Inglehart and the management science framework of Hofstede. We use these theories to develop (main-effect) hypotheses about the cultural contexts in which TCE has higher predictive power as well as (interaction) hypotheses regarding particular cultural contexts that may inherently be more inclined than others to adopt certain non-market governance modes if the market “fails.” Hypotheses are tested using a meta-analysis on data collected from 128 studies from 12 countries on 3 continents, representing governance decisions of 60,926 companies. We find that TCE is a universal theory across all cultural contexts. This being said, we find that in societies low on power distance and in societies characterized by a strong emphasis on secular-rational and self-expression values, companies are more strongly guided in their governance decisions by economic, transaction-cost considerations than companies in societies high on power distance and in countries that are characterized by traditional and survival values. Further, TCE’s power to predict the specific type of non-market governance employed by the firm is systematically moderated by the national culture in which the firm operates. The power of TCE for predicting hierarchical governance is higher in countries that rate high on secular-rational values and on uncertainty avoidance and low on long-term orientation, whereas TCE is more diagnostic for predicting relational governance in countries high on self-expression values and low on power distance and on uncertainty avoidance. In sum, our meta-analysis provides support for our thesis that to fully understand governance choices made by firms, we need to integrate TCE and cultural theory. While managers around the world are guided by economic considerations, the cultural context in which they operate exerts a substantial—and predictable—contingent effect on their governance choices.

Corporate culture as a theory of the firm

Corporate Culture

Towards a Corporate Cultural Theory Towards a Corporate Cultural Theory

The Complexity of Corporate Culture as a Potential Source of Firm Profit Differentials

Corporate Culture Choice and Resource Allocation: A New Perspective on Incentive Theory

Research on corporate culture system model and its construction

Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective

Corporate Culture and Organizational Fragility

Creating Corporate Culture: a study of strategies employed to cultivate High Performance Mentality within Sony Ericsson

Organizational Culture: Structure and Evolution

Features of the formation of corporate culture in the organization: principles and mechanisms

THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE COMPANY'S CORPORATE CULTURE

Is Organizational Culture the Core Competence of Corporations? an Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Cultural Fitness and Corporate Performance

Construction Model Of Corporate Social Capital And Implications For Enterprises In China - An Interactive Perspective

Managerial contracting and corporate social responsibility

The Firm as a Subsociety: Purpose, Justice, and the Theory of the Firm

Corporate cultures. Turning "us versus them" into "we"

Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory

Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: a test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede

The Relationship among Corporate Culture, Corporate Learning and Corporate Performance: A Structural Equation Model Analysis