Abstract:Objective·To evaluate the abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 0.5 second (FEV0.5) and FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing, as well as the clinical significance of different cut-off points for improvement rates before and after bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of children with bronchial asthma (asthma).Methods·From January 2020 to February 2021, school-age children diagnosed with asthma during their hospitalization at the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were selected. The data on lung ventilation function testing and bronchodilator testing were collected. The difference in abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of FEVt in children in lung ventilation function testing was compared. Diagnostic test four grid table was used to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the diagnosis of asthma before and after bronchodilation testing.Results·A total of 148 children were included. All enrolled cases completed lung ventilation function testing, with 51 cases completing bronchodilation testing simultaneously. The results of lung ventilation function testing showed that 21 patients had obstructive ventilation dysfunction, 30 patients had small airway dysfunction, and the remaining patients had normal, restrictive or mixed ventilation dysfunction. The results of bronchodilation testing showed that in the 51 asthmatic children with obstructive ventilation dysfunction and small airway dysfunction, 22 of them were positive for bronchodilation testing. The comparison of the abnormal rates of FEVt measured/predicted values showed that the abnormal rates of FEV0.75 measured/predicted values were higher than those of FEV1 and FEV0.5 (χ2=10.18, P=0.000; χ2=10.95, P=0.000). The sensitivity and specificity analysis results of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of EFV0.75 and FEV0.5 showed that the cut-off point for FEV0.5 improvement rate at 16% had very high sensitivity and specificity, with the highest Jordan index; the cut-off points for FEV0.75 improvement rate were 12% and 14%, respectively, with sensitivity and specificity reaching 100%.Conclusion·The measured/predicted value of FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing can be considered as an alternative indicator for the measured/predicted value of FEV1 to further evaluate the presence of obstructive ventilation dysfunction. On the basis of the results of bronchodilation testing, it can be considered to analyze the airway reversibility by combining the best cut-off points of FEV0.75 and FEV0.5 improvement rates, in order to enhance the clinical value of bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of asthma.

A comparative study of bronchodilator response: utilizing pre-bronchodilator versus predicted normal values

Clinical significance of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the determination of pulmonary function in children with bronchial asthma

The Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow As Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Adults with Chronic Cough.

Prevalence of Bronchodilator Responsiveness: A Comparison of Old Versus New Criteria

Small-Airway Function Variables in Spirometry, Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide, and Circulating Eosinophils Predicted Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Patients with Mild Asthma.

The value of bronchodilator response in FEV1 and FeNO for differentiating between chronic respiratory diseases: an observational study

Diagnostic Value of Various Pulmonary Function Standards of Bronchodilation Test

Airway Inflammation, Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness, and Anti-Asthma Therapy Responses in Cough Variant Asthma and Classic Asthma with FEV1%≥80% Predicted

Spirometric Changes in Bronchodilation Tests as Predictors of Asthma Diagnosis and Treatment Response in Patients with FEV1 ≥ 80% Predicted

Bronchodilator Responsiveness Defined by the 2005 and 2021 ERS/ATS Criteria in Patients with Asthma as Well as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Relation of changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) during bronchoconstriction

Using % predicted change during bronchial challenge testing to remove bias

[A Study of Airway Reactivity and Nature of Chronic Asthmatic Bronchitis].

Bronchodilator Delivery via High-Flow Nasal Cannula: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effects of Gas Flows

Residual Volume and Total Lung Capacity to Assess Reversibility in Obstructive Lung Disease

Clinical Differential Diagnosis in Bronchial Asthma Patients with Chest Tightness Suggestive of Coronary Heart Disease by Peak Flow Meter

Bronchodilator reversibility in asthma and COPD: findings from three large population studies

Assessing the Impact of the Updated 2021 European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society Criteria on Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma

Impact of Using Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Spirometry Reference Values in a Chinese Population

Prediction of bronchodilation test in adults with chronic cough suspected of cough variant asthma

Impact of Using Pre- and Postbronchodilator Spirometry Reference Values in a Chinese Population