Abstract:Objective·To evaluate the abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 0.5 second (FEV0.5) and FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing, as well as the clinical significance of different cut-off points for improvement rates before and after bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of children with bronchial asthma (asthma).Methods·From January 2020 to February 2021, school-age children diagnosed with asthma during their hospitalization at the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were selected. The data on lung ventilation function testing and bronchodilator testing were collected. The difference in abnormal rates of measured/predicted values of FEVt in children in lung ventilation function testing was compared. Diagnostic test four grid table was used to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the diagnosis of asthma before and after bronchodilation testing.Results·A total of 148 children were included. All enrolled cases completed lung ventilation function testing, with 51 cases completing bronchodilation testing simultaneously. The results of lung ventilation function testing showed that 21 patients had obstructive ventilation dysfunction, 30 patients had small airway dysfunction, and the remaining patients had normal, restrictive or mixed ventilation dysfunction. The results of bronchodilation testing showed that in the 51 asthmatic children with obstructive ventilation dysfunction and small airway dysfunction, 22 of them were positive for bronchodilation testing. The comparison of the abnormal rates of FEVt measured/predicted values showed that the abnormal rates of FEV0.75 measured/predicted values were higher than those of FEV1 and FEV0.5 (χ2=10.18, P=0.000; χ2=10.95, P=0.000). The sensitivity and specificity analysis results of different cut-off points for the improvement rates of EFV0.75 and FEV0.5 showed that the cut-off point for FEV0.5 improvement rate at 16% had very high sensitivity and specificity, with the highest Jordan index; the cut-off points for FEV0.75 improvement rate were 12% and 14%, respectively, with sensitivity and specificity reaching 100%.Conclusion·The measured/predicted value of FEV0.75 in lung ventilation function testing can be considered as an alternative indicator for the measured/predicted value of FEV1 to further evaluate the presence of obstructive ventilation dysfunction. On the basis of the results of bronchodilation testing, it can be considered to analyze the airway reversibility by combining the best cut-off points of FEV0.75 and FEV0.5 improvement rates, in order to enhance the clinical value of bronchodilation testing in the diagnosis of asthma.

Spirometric Changes in Bronchodilation Tests as Predictors of Asthma Diagnosis and Treatment Response in Patients with FEV1 ≥ 80% Predicted

Clinical significance of FEV0.5 and FEV0.75 in the determination of pulmonary function in children with bronchial asthma

Small-Airway Function Variables in Spirometry, Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide, and Circulating Eosinophils Predicted Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Patients with Mild Asthma.

The Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow As Predictive Markers of Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness in Adults with Chronic Cough.

The value of bronchodilator response in FEV1 and FeNO for differentiating between chronic respiratory diseases: an observational study

Correlation between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and small airway function in patients with bronchial asthma and its influencing factors

(FEV3-FEV1)/FVC: a Terminal-Airflow Variable for Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Inflammation Prediction in Patients with Symptoms Despite Preserved Spirometry

Importance of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in diagnosis of bronchiectasis accompanied with bronchial asthma

Prediction of bronchodilation test in adults with chronic cough suspected of cough variant asthma

Airway Inflammation, Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness, and Anti-Asthma Therapy Responses in Cough Variant Asthma and Classic Asthma with FEV1%≥80% Predicted

Diagnostic possibility of the combination of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil count for eosinophilic asthma

Albuterol inhalation increases FeNO level in steroid‐naive asthmatics but not COPD patients with reversibility

Quantitative CT Metrics for the Prediction of Therapeutic Effect in Asthma.

Sex Differences of Small Airway Function and Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Mild Asthma

Diagnostic Value And Influencing Factors Of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide In Suspected Asthma Patients

[Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Bronchial Inflammatory Lung Diseases].

Predictive value of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophils on the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma patients

The diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in allergic asthma

Both fractional exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophil were associated with uncontrolled asthma

Exhaled nitric oxide predictes steroid responsiveness

The value of small airway function parameters and fractional exhaled nitric oxide for predicting positive methacholine challenge test in asthmatics of different ages with FEV<sub>1</sub> 80% predicted