Diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma

Ning ZHU,Jian HE,Xiao-dong CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16138/j.1673-6087.2011.02.011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the association between fractional exhaled nitric oxide ( FeNO) and PD20-FEV1. 0 in bronchial provocation test ( BPT-PD20-FEV1. 0 ) and to compare the value of them in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma. Methods 53 patients with chronic cough, who were measured by both bronchial provocation test and fractional exhaled nitric oxide test in Respiratory Department, Huashan Hospital during Jan 2013 and Oct 2013, were finally included. 40 patients were diagnosed as cough variant asthma, 33 of which had positive results in BPT. 13 pa-tients were diagnosed as non cough variant asthma, without positive results in BPT. We compared the results of FeNO between the two groups, and explored the association between FeNO and BPT-PD20-FEV1. 0 , and evaluated the diag-nostic value of FeNO and BPT through receiver operating characteristic curve ( ROC) . Results The level of FeNO in CVA patients was significantly higher than that in patients without CVA (P=0. 0078). FeNO was negatively relat-ed to BPT-PD20-FEV1.0 in CVA patients (r= -0. 35, P=0. 049). Area under curve (AUC) of FeNO (0. 73, 95% CI, 0. 59-0. 84) was statistically less than AUC of BPT (0. 91, 95%CI, 0. 59-0. 84). Conclusion Al-though FeNO could reflect the level of bronchial inflammation, the diagnostic value of FeNO is less than that of BPT. Therefore, the diagnosis of CVA could not be confirmed only by FeNO measurement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?