Abstract:Prior studies have paid attention to the influence of domestic experience on internationalization, for which domestic experience primarily refers to the accumulation of internationalization knowledge from industrial peers or partners at home. We argue that the commonalities and differences between international experience and domestic cross-regional experience have not been fully incorporated in previous frameworks in the literature. Thus, in untangling the commonalities, we purposively differentiate domestic experience into two dimensions, i.e., repetitionbased experience and diversity-based experience, to investigate the contingent role of making domestic cross-regional investments in shaping the relationship between international experience and the speed of internationalization. We expect that these two dimensions of domestic experience will moderate the relationship between international experience and the speed of internationalization in a different way. More specifically, repetition-based experience has a negative moderating effect while diversity-based experience has a positive moderating effect. Further, considering the differences between international investments and domestic investments, we expect that the joint impacts of international experience and domestic cross-regional experience on internationalization speed are contingent on whether firms have sufficient resources to support multiple learning or whether institutions between the home country and foreign country is similar enough for cross-context application. We expect that financial slack and institutional distance between prior foreign entries' country and the home country play significant three-way moderating roles in setting boundaries for the relationship between domestic experience and international experience. Based on the analysis of 302 Chinese publicly listed firms from 2001 to 2014, the dynamic panel data regression results support our hypotheses. Overall, our simultaneous consideration of commonalities and differences between domestic investments and international investments sheds light on how MNCs learn from both international and domestic investments to speed up their foreign expansions.

When do firms learn? Learning before versus after exporting

Detecting Learning by Exporting and from Exporters

Do Domestic and Foreign Exporters Differ in Learning by Exporting? Evidence from China

How you export matters: Export mode, learning and productivity in China

How Does Technology Import and Export Affect the Innovative Performance of Firms? From the Perspective of Emerging Markets Firms

Review of the Relationship between the Export Behavior and Productivity in Chinese Enterprises:2001—2007

Firm R&D, Absorptive Capacity, and Learning by Exporting Firm-level Evidence from China

Learning by exporting: Evidence from patent citations in China

Learning from Neighbors and Differentiating Export Quality

R&D Investments, Exporting, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity

The Learning Effect Of Exporting And Importing Of Chinese High-Tech Products

How you pay matters: performance-related pay and learning by exporting

Learning from Processing Trade: Firm Evidence from China

Export market penetration dynamics

Does Learning at Home and from Abroad Boost the Foreign Subsidiary Performance of Emerging Economy Multinational Enterprises?

Firm heterogeneity and exporting behavior: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms

Pre-Export R&D, Exporting and Productivity Gains: Evidence from Chinese Firms

“Learning from Yourself” or “learning from Others”: Multi-scalar Knowledge Spillovers and the Evolution of Firms’ Export Products

Untangling the Commonalities and Differences Between Domestic Cross-Regional Experience and International Experience in Shaping Speed of Internationalization

Organizational learning, strategic guanxi networking, co-creation marketing strategy and B2B export performance: evidence from emerging market export venture

In Search of (Factor-Biased) Learning by Exporting