The Effects Of Ownership Structure And Industry Characteristics On Export Performance
dahai fu,yanrui wu,yihong tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2011.d12.fu
2011-01-01
Abstract:China has achieved spectacular growth in exports in the past three decades and became the world's largest exporter of manufactured goods in 2009. Exploring the determinants of the export performance at the firm level is a critical step to understand the success of the Chinese exports. While the existing economic literature mainly focuses on the role of firm heterogeneity such as productivity, firm size, and innovation activities in determining export performance of firms, researchers from the international business field argue that the determinants of export performance should be assessed at the two broad levels, that is, the external environment level and the internal level.In response to this claim, we adopt an integrative framework incorporating the governance-strategy-performance (GSP) paradigm and structure-conduct-performance (SCP) to examine the impact of ownership structure (internal factors) and industry characteristics (external factors) on the export performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. To achieve this aim, three different yet related models are employed, namely, the logit model, tobit model and ordered probit model, to investigate the effects of covariates of our interest on the export propensity, export intensity and export strategies of Chinese firms in the manufacturing sector during the period 1999-2003, respectively. Unlike the existing studies, this paper not only distinguishes domestic firms from foreign firms but also differentiates wholly-owned enterprises from joint ventures with different dominant equity holders. We also consider the effect of industry characteristics captured by industry concentration, industry export-orientation and industry capital intensity.We find that the presence of wholly-owned firms and joint ventures with foreign control has a positive effect on export propensity and intensity. Firms with non-HMT control are more export-oriented than those with HMT control. Furthermore, firms with such characteristics are more likely to be persistent exporters, with the exception of joint ventures with HMT control, which are less likely to export persistently. Joint ventures with domestic control (non-state or state control) and wholly locally owned enterprises are less likely to export or improve their export status, and have lower export intensity. Moreover, the impact of industry concentration on export performance remains inconclusive, meaning further studies or the use alternative measurements are required. The findings about the effects of industry export orientation and capital intensity are consistent across the three different models. The results imply that firms operating in export-oriented and labour intensive industries are more likely to export, have high export intensities, and be persistent exporters.