30‐sit‐to‐stand power is a better tool than isometric knee extensor strength to detect motor impairment in people with haemophilic arthropathy

Carlos Cruz‐Montecinos,María Moena‐León,Antonio Durán‐Ovalle,Aracelli Lizama‐Jofré,Verónica Soto,Andrés Oyarzún,Claudio Tapia,Sandro R. Freitas,Ronei S. Pinto,Rodrigo Núñez‐Cortés,Carla Daffunchio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.15021
2024-05-09
Haemophilia
Abstract:Introduction Regular assessment of motor impairments is crucial in people with haemophilic arthropathy (PwHA). This study aimed to determine if there are differences in 30‐seconds sit‐to‐stand (30‐STS) power and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the knee extensors between PwHA and healthy control group (CG). The secondary aims were to investigate the correlation between 30‐STS power and MVIC of knee extensors with clinical characteristics and to assess their effectiveness in identifying motor impairment in PwHA. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted by collecting data from PwHA (n = 17) and a sedentary CG (n = 15). MVIC (torque) and 30‐STS power were normalised to body mass. Correlation analysis and simple linear regression adjusted for age were used to assess the association between tests and clinical variables. Using z‐scores derived from the mean and standard deviation of the CG, we compared the MVIC and the 30‐STS power in PwHA. Results PwHA showed lower MVIC and 30‐STS power compared to CG (p .8). Lower 30‐STS power was associated with greater joint impairment and greater fear of movement, whereas MVIC showed no association with clinical variables. 30‐STS power showed a lower z‐score compared to MVIC (p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?