Abstract:Territorial behavior has been studied initially in animal behavior literatures, and introduced into organization behavior area recently by Brown, Lawrence, and Robinson （2005）. Territorial behavior is an emerging topic in organization behavior research. Although there are some literatures on this topic, our knowledge about that is still in infant. The definition, theoretical building, and empirical test are still immature. In this paper, I firstly discussed the definition of territorial behavior. Brown and his colleagues （2005） define territoriality as behavioral expression of psychological possession over the target. I think their definition is too narrow by treating territoriality as a behavior construct. Territoriality includes not only the behavioral aspect, but also cognition and intention aspects. Therefore, it＇ s important to separate territorial behavior from territoriality. We then define territory as an object over which individual or group feels a certain control. Territorial behavior refers to the actions that are used to construct, communicate, maintain, restore, defend, and enlarge territory. Territoriality is defined as a psychological tendency of protecting territory from invading, includes territorial belief/cognition, ter- ritorial affection, and territorial behavioral tendency. I also identified the differences between territorial behavior and similar constructs （e. g. , political behavior, authority exercising, impression management, face-saving and counterproductive work behavior）. Secondly, the present paper reviewed the dimensionaIity and measurement of territorial behavior. The author argued that individual may have different behaviors in different territories; therefore it is important to identify the types of territory in organization. Brown et al. （2005） have identified four types of territorial behaviors ： identity o- riented marking; control-oriented marking; anticipatory defense; and reactionary defense. He also developed a measure for territorial behavior in workspace. However, the more interesting and valuable territorial behaviors in organization are directed to social object （ i. e. , information and job）. Lack of valid measure of territorial behavior o- ver social object has limited the development of this field research. Thirdly, the present paper discussed the antecedents and consequences of territorial behavior. Psychological ownership is often treated as an important antecedent of territorial behavior. However, one study found that individuals are more likely to conduct territorial behavior when they feel lack of control over the environment. Thus, terri- torial behavior may reinforce psychological ownership. The relationship between psychological ownership and territo- rial behavior are more complex than expected. Although some scholars has investigated some individual variables （e. g. , gender）, we still need to investigate how the individual （e. g. , personality） and organizational variables （e. g. , organizational culture） influence territorial behavior. There are also some studies that have discussed the consequence of territorial behavior. However, most previous studies focused on individual level. We are eager to know how territorial behavior influence team-level and organization-level performance. Another interesting topic related to territorial behavior research is territorial infringement. The author argued that future studies need to answer three important questions：（1） the difference between territorial infringement and psychological contract violation; （2） how different types of infringement induce different reactions ; （3） what is the underlying mechanism. In conclusion, the author argued that future research should focus on improving and extending territorial bebavior construct, empirically investigating the antecedents and consequences of territorial behavior, and applying this perspective to other research areas.

This is mine and not yours! Effects of leader territorial behavior on employee workplace outcomes

Leadership Justice and Negative Organizational Behaviors: Mediated by Affective Commitment

Author Response for "how Does Leader Self‐sacrifice Lead to Employees' Unethical Pro‐organizational Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Model"

Effects of Task and Relationship Conflicts on Individual Work Behaviors

Authentic Leadership and Taking Charge Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Capital and Occupational Calling

The Trickle-Down Effect of Territorial Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

Territorial Behaviors Research： an Emerging Area in Organizational Behavior

The Impact of Participative Leadership on Job Performance and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Distinguishing Between the Mediating Effects of Affective and Cognitive Trust

It's mine! Psychological ownership of one's job explains positive and negative workplace outcomes of job engagement

Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: relationship and outcomes

Why and When Temporary Workers Engage in More Counterproductive Work Behaviors with Permanent Employees in Chinese State-Own Enterprise: A Social Identity Perspective

The Effect of Leader Positive Affectivity on Team Member Turnover Intention and Team Organizational Citizenship Behavior

The unintended consequences of temporal leadership: a multilevel investigation of the effects of temporal leadership on employee silence

Exploring the Impact of Leadership Characteristics on Subordinates’ Counterproductive Work Behavior: From the Organizational Cultural Psychology Perspective

Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective.

Anger for good? Unethical‐behavior‐targeted leader anger expression and its consequences on team outcomes

The effects of education and allocentrism on organizational commitment in Chinese companies

The Idea Is Mine! An Empirical Examination on the Effect of Leaders’ Credit Claiming on Employees’ Work Outcomes

The Effect of Knowledge Hiding on the Relationship Among Territoriality, Organization Embeddedness, Ethical Leadership, and Workplace Deviance

Need to Belong under Attack: Workplace Ostracism Brings Workplace Loneliness and Damaged Performance

The Positive Effect of Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Performance: The Moderating Role of Power Distance