Territorial Behaviors Research: an Emerging Area in Organizational Behavior

彭贺
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2012.01.021
2012-01-01
Abstract:Territorial behavior has been studied initially in animal behavior literatures, and introduced into organization behavior area recently by Brown, Lawrence, and Robinson (2005). Territorial behavior is an emerging topic in organization behavior research. Although there are some literatures on this topic, our knowledge about that is still in infant. The definition, theoretical building, and empirical test are still immature. In this paper, I firstly discussed the definition of territorial behavior. Brown and his colleagues (2005) define territoriality as behavioral expression of psychological possession over the target. I think their definition is too narrow by treating territoriality as a behavior construct. Territoriality includes not only the behavioral aspect, but also cognition and intention aspects. Therefore, it' s important to separate territorial behavior from territoriality. We then define territory as an object over which individual or group feels a certain control. Territorial behavior refers to the actions that are used to construct, communicate, maintain, restore, defend, and enlarge territory. Territoriality is defined as a psychological tendency of protecting territory from invading, includes territorial belief/cognition, ter- ritorial affection, and territorial behavioral tendency. I also identified the differences between territorial behavior and similar constructs (e. g. , political behavior, authority exercising, impression management, face-saving and counterproductive work behavior). Secondly, the present paper reviewed the dimensionaIity and measurement of territorial behavior. The author argued that individual may have different behaviors in different territories; therefore it is important to identify the types of territory in organization. Brown et al. (2005) have identified four types of territorial behaviors : identity o- riented marking; control-oriented marking; anticipatory defense; and reactionary defense. He also developed a measure for territorial behavior in workspace. However, the more interesting and valuable territorial behaviors in organization are directed to social object ( i. e. , information and job). Lack of valid measure of territorial behavior o- ver social object has limited the development of this field research. Thirdly, the present paper discussed the antecedents and consequences of territorial behavior. Psychological ownership is often treated as an important antecedent of territorial behavior. However, one study found that individuals are more likely to conduct territorial behavior when they feel lack of control over the environment. Thus, terri- torial behavior may reinforce psychological ownership. The relationship between psychological ownership and territo- rial behavior are more complex than expected. Although some scholars has investigated some individual variables (e. g. , gender), we still need to investigate how the individual (e. g. , personality) and organizational variables (e. g. , organizational culture) influence territorial behavior. There are also some studies that have discussed the consequence of territorial behavior. However, most previous studies focused on individual level. We are eager to know how territorial behavior influence team-level and organization-level performance. Another interesting topic related to territorial behavior research is territorial infringement. The author argued that future studies need to answer three important questions: (1) the difference between territorial infringement and psychological contract violation; (2) how different types of infringement induce different reactions ; (3) what is the underlying mechanism. In conclusion, the author argued that future research should focus on improving and extending territorial bebavior construct, empirically investigating the antecedents and consequences of territorial behavior, and applying this perspective to other research areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?