Abstract:Volumetric muscle loss (VML) resulting from extremity trauma presents chronic and persistent functional deficits, restricted joint range of motion, and fibrosis, which ultimately manifest disability. Currently, there is a clinical need for therapies aimed at addressing the debilitating outcomes due to VML injuries. Recent investigations have examined the use of commercially available biological scaffolds as a regenerative medicine approach for VML. However, there is a paucity of large animal data to advance clinical translation. We hypothesized that repair of VML injuries with an acellular biologic scaffold would improve function, specifically neuromuscular strength following injury. To test this hypothesis, female Yorkshire Cross pigs (n=10) were randomized to sham or an ~20% VML injury to the peroneous tertius muscle, and injuries were left non‐repaired, or surgically repaired with an acellular biologic scaffold derived from either porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) or urinary bladder matrix (UBM) using standard clinical surgical implantation procedures. Analysis of muscle volume using CT imaging and muscle function via peroneal nerve stimulation was conducted through 12 weeks post‐injury. At this terminal time‐point, full thickness biopsy samples were used for histological analysis and sequencing of RNA extracted from the injured muscle tissue. All studies were conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, the Implementing Animal Welfare Regulations and in accordance with the principles of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Unexpected adverse advents occurred in 80% of the VML injuries repaired with the SIS scaffold. Both the repair with SIS and UBM resulted in a significant fibrotic response and increased volume of the anterior compartment. However, this volume could not be attributed to increased muscle, as histologic analysis of the muscle indicated sub‐physiologic islands of muscle fibers (~50 fibers). To understand the quality of muscle, peak muscle torque was normalized to the CT‐derived volume of the anterior compartment at 10 weeks post‐injury. Collectively in the non‐ and ECM‐repaired limbs there was ~45% deficit compared to sham operated limbs. Additionally, in both the non‐ and ECM‐repaired limbs there was an ~30% deficit in absolute peak isometric torque through 12 weeks post‐injury. Tissue level RNA sequencing analysis of the non‐repaired and surgically repaired samples compared to Sham controls revealed increases in expression of sets of genes associated with inflammatory signaling and fibrogenesis and downregulation of myogenic repair gene sets. Quantitative comparison of the transcriptomes from surgically repaired samples against the non‐repaired samples indicated high degrees of correlation amongst the differentially expressed genes. These results indicate the gene expression programs induced from a VML insult are not appreciably augmented when treated with surgical repair of an acellular biologic scaffold. Collectively, these data indicate that VML results in extensive and continued disruption of the remaining musculature and that ECM repair does not ameliorate the resulting pathobiology.

Age-Associated Functional Healing of Musculoskeletal Trauma Through Regenerative Engineering and Rehabilitation

Regenerative Repair of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury is Sensitive to Age

Anti-inflammatory therapy enables robot-actuated regeneration of aged muscle

Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: Biomaterials-Based Strategies for the Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Regenerative medicine for skeletal muscle loss: a review of current tissue engineering approaches

Bioactive Nanofiber-Hydrogel Composite Regulates Regenerative Microenvironment for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration after Volumetric Muscle Loss

Combined regenerative rehabilitation improves recovery following volumetric muscle loss injury in a rat model

The effect of autologous repair and voluntary wheel running on force recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss

Effects of volumetric muscle loss injury on contractile function, and bone structure and functional capacity in male C57BL/6J mice

Cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors: Engineering strategies for improving regeneration following volumetric muscle loss

Cell-scale porosity in microporous annealed particle (MAP) scaffolds modulates immune response and promotes formation of innervated muscle fibers in volumetric muscle loss injuries

Autologous minced muscle grafts improve endogenous fracture healing and muscle strength after musculoskeletal trauma

Acellular Biological Scaffold Repair Does Not Overcome the Pathobiology of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury

Improving Functional Muscle Regeneration in Volumetric Muscle Loss Injuries by Shifting the Balance of Inflammatory and Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators

Skeletal Muscle Regenerative Engineering

Rehabilitative exercise and spatially patterned nanofibrillar scaffolds enhance vascularization and innervation following volumetric muscle loss

Reconstructing vascular networks promotes the repair of skeletal muscle following volumetric muscle loss by pre-vascularized tissue constructs

Tissue Engineered 3D Constructs for Volumetric Muscle Loss

Acellular collagen–glycosaminoglycan matrix promotes functional recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss

Critical-Size Defect Tibialis Anterior (TA) Muscle Regeneration using Ex-Vivo Mice Hindlimbs Culturing under Dynamic Mechanical Loading