Abstract:Volumetric muscle loss (VML) resulting from extremity trauma presents chronic and persistent functional deficits, restricted joint range of motion, and fibrosis, which ultimately manifest disability. Currently, there is a clinical need for therapies aimed at addressing the debilitating outcomes due to VML injuries. Recent investigations have examined the use of commercially available biological scaffolds as a regenerative medicine approach for VML. However, there is a paucity of large animal data to advance clinical translation. We hypothesized that repair of VML injuries with an acellular biologic scaffold would improve function, specifically neuromuscular strength following injury. To test this hypothesis, female Yorkshire Cross pigs (n=10) were randomized to sham or an ~20% VML injury to the peroneous tertius muscle, and injuries were left non‐repaired, or surgically repaired with an acellular biologic scaffold derived from either porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) or urinary bladder matrix (UBM) using standard clinical surgical implantation procedures. Analysis of muscle volume using CT imaging and muscle function via peroneal nerve stimulation was conducted through 12 weeks post‐injury. At this terminal time‐point, full thickness biopsy samples were used for histological analysis and sequencing of RNA extracted from the injured muscle tissue. All studies were conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, the Implementing Animal Welfare Regulations and in accordance with the principles of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Unexpected adverse advents occurred in 80% of the VML injuries repaired with the SIS scaffold. Both the repair with SIS and UBM resulted in a significant fibrotic response and increased volume of the anterior compartment. However, this volume could not be attributed to increased muscle, as histologic analysis of the muscle indicated sub‐physiologic islands of muscle fibers (~50 fibers). To understand the quality of muscle, peak muscle torque was normalized to the CT‐derived volume of the anterior compartment at 10 weeks post‐injury. Collectively in the non‐ and ECM‐repaired limbs there was ~45% deficit compared to sham operated limbs. Additionally, in both the non‐ and ECM‐repaired limbs there was an ~30% deficit in absolute peak isometric torque through 12 weeks post‐injury. Tissue level RNA sequencing analysis of the non‐repaired and surgically repaired samples compared to Sham controls revealed increases in expression of sets of genes associated with inflammatory signaling and fibrogenesis and downregulation of myogenic repair gene sets. Quantitative comparison of the transcriptomes from surgically repaired samples against the non‐repaired samples indicated high degrees of correlation amongst the differentially expressed genes. These results indicate the gene expression programs induced from a VML insult are not appreciably augmented when treated with surgical repair of an acellular biologic scaffold. Collectively, these data indicate that VML results in extensive and continued disruption of the remaining musculature and that ECM repair does not ameliorate the resulting pathobiology.

Regenerative Repair of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury is Sensitive to Age

Age-Associated Functional Healing of Musculoskeletal Trauma Through Regenerative Engineering and Rehabilitation

A Myogenic Niche with a Proper Mechanical Stress Environment Improves Abdominal Wall Muscle Repair by Modulating Immunity and Preventing Fibrosis.

Nandrolone supplementation does not improve functional recovery in an aged animal model of volumetric muscle loss injury

Acellular Biological Scaffold Repair Does Not Overcome the Pathobiology of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury

VEGFA Promotes Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Aging

The effect of autologous repair and voluntary wheel running on force recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss

Implantation of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix with Resistance Training Effectively Repairs a Volumetric Muscle Loss

Acellular collagen–glycosaminoglycan matrix promotes functional recovery in a rat model of volumetric muscle loss

Combined regenerative rehabilitation improves recovery following volumetric muscle loss injury in a rat model

A 30% Volumetric Muscle Loss Does Not Result in Sustained Functional Deficits After a 90-Day Recovery in Rats

A Standardized Rat Model of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury for the Development of Tissue Engineering Therapies

Therapeutic Sources of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration from Volumetric Muscle Loss: A Narrative Review

Regenerative medicine for skeletal muscle loss: a review of current tissue engineering approaches

Contribution of minced muscle graft progenitor cells to muscle fiber formation after volumetric muscle loss injury in wild‐type and immune deficient mice

Graft alignment impacts the regenerative response of skeletal muscle after volumetric muscle loss in a rat model

Cell-scale porosity in microporous annealed particle (MAP) scaffolds modulates immune response and promotes formation of innervated muscle fibers in volumetric muscle loss injuries

An Autologous Muscle Tissue Expansion Approach for the Treatment of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Muscle-Specific ECM Fibers Made with Anchored Cell Sheet Engineering Support Tissue Regeneration in Rat Models of Volumetric Muscle Loss

Freeze-dried porous collagen scaffolds for the repair of volumetric muscle loss injuries

Biomimetic scaffolds for regeneration of volumetric muscle loss in skeletal muscle injuries