Abstract:During disease outbreaks or pandemics, policy makers must convey information to the public for informative purposes (eg, morbidity or mortality rates). They must also motivate members of the public to cooperate with the guidelines, specifically by changing their usual behavior. Policy makers have traditionally adopted a didactic and formalistic stance by conveying dry, statistics-based health information to the public. They have not yet considered the alternative of providing health information in the form of narrative evidence, using stories that address both cognitive and emotional aspects. The aim of this viewpoint paper is to introduce policy makers to the advantages of using narrative evidence to provide health information during a disease outbreak or pandemic such as COVID-19. Throughout human history, authorities have tended to employ apocalyptic narratives during disease outbreaks or pandemics. This viewpoint paper proposes an alternative coping narrative that includes the following components: segmentation; barrier reduction; role models; empathy and support; strengthening self-efficacy, community efficacy, and coping tools; preventing stigmatization of at-risk populations; and communicating uncertainty. It also discusses five conditions for using narrative evidence to produce an effective communication campaign on social media: (1) identifying narratives that reveal the needs, personal experiences, and questions of different subgroups to tailor messaging to produce targeted behavioral change; (2) providing separate and distinct treatment of each information unit or theory that arises on social networks; (3) identifying positive deviants who found creative solutions for stress during the COVID-19 crisis not found by other members of the community; (4) creating different stories of coping; and (5) maintaining a dialogue with population subgroups (eg, skeptical and hesitant groups). The paper concludes by proposing criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of a narrative.

Effects of cooperative and uncooperative narratives on trust during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experimental evidence

The effects of cognitive- and affective-based trust on students’ knowledge sharing and learning performance during the Covid-19 pandemic

Cooperation and Trust Across Societies During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Assessing the effects of pandemic risk on cooperation and social norms using a before-after Covid-19 comparison in two long-term experiments

Interpersonal Risk Communication Matters More Than Media Risk Communication in Its Impact on Individuals' Trust and Preventive Behaviors During COVID-19.

The COVID-19 Pandemic Reduces Trust Behavior

Narratives and opinion polarization: a survey experiment

Shared fate was associated with sustained cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Trust and accountability in times of crisis

Different roles of interpersonal trust and institutional trust in COVID-19 pandemic control

Social and political trust diverge during a crisis

Using first-person narratives about healthcare workers and people who are incarcerated to motivate helping behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic

Assessing the Effect of Nonvisual Information Factors in Pandemic-Related Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Experiment

Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature

Using Narrative Evidence to Convey Health Information on Social Media: The Case of COVID-19

Trust predicts compliance with COVID-19 containment policies: Evidence from ten countries using big data

Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis

Predicting Public Cooperation with Face Covering at the Early Phases of COVID-19: Building Public Trust, Confidence, Knowledge Through Governmental Two-Way Symmetrical Communication

How pandemic detective narratives potentiate and debilitate trust

Morality in the echo chamber: The relationship between belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories and public health support and the mediating role of moral identity and morality-as-cooperation across 67 countries

Trust as a catalyst: revealing the impact of government trust and professional trust on public health policy compliance during a pandemic