Abstract:Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected nearly every facet of life, constituting a "new normal" and prompting an ongoing collective psychological crisis. People's ways of coping with the pandemic and corresponding well-being are of particular research interest; however, these constructs have largely been examined using deductive quantitative approaches, deficit-based lenses, and mononational samples. Methods: The current mixed-methods study used inductive-sequential (QUAL → QUAN) approaches to explore positive coping strategies (approach coping style and COVID-related connection appraisal) and well-being (loneliness, distress, and happiness) across individuals from the United States, Japan, and Mexico. Qualitative data were gathered from N = 141 U.S., Japanese, and Mexican adults to examine how people perceived connection during the pandemic. Results: Qualitative analyses illuminated common themes in which people appraised the pandemic as an opportunity for connection and strengthened interpersonal relationships. Quantitative measures, including a newly-developed questionnaire on COVID-related connection appraisal, were then administered to a separate sample of N = 302 adults in the U.S, Japan, and Mexico to assess associations among approach coping style, COVID-related connection appraisal, and well-being outcomes (loneliness, distress, happiness). Quantitative analyses found significant associations among approach coping style, COVID-related connection appraisal, and all well-being outcomes. Of note, these associations did not differ by country. COVID-related connection appraisal mediated the relationship between approach coping style and two well-being outcomes (loneliness and happiness). Discussion: Findings point to approach coping style and connection appraisal as pathways for resilience and growth in the face of global suffering.

Shared fate was associated with sustained cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Cooperation and Trust Across Societies During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Assessing the effects of pandemic risk on cooperation and social norms using a before-after Covid-19 comparison in two long-term experiments

Risk Perception, Cooperation, and Emotional Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring Adaptive Risk Perception

Fight Alone or Together? The Influence of Risk Perception on Helping Behavior

Relationship difficulties and "technoference" during the COVID-19 pandemic

Risk and resilience in couple's adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic

Risk and resilience in couple’s adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic

Coming together or coming apart? Changes in social cohesion during the Covid-19 pandemic in England

Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID-19

Heterogeneous empathic reactions and their associations with adherence and prosocial behaviors during a pandemic

Does threat trigger prosociality? The relation between basic individual values, threat appraisals, and prosocial helping intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Coping, connection appraisal, and well-being during COVID-19 in the U.S., Japan, and Mexico

Prosocial behavior promotes positive emotion during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early COVID-19 research

Global Consciousness Predicts Behavioral Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence From 35 Cultures

Love in the time of COVID‐19: A brief report on relationship and individual functioning among committed couples in the United States while under shelter‐in‐place orders

Unity or Estrangement Under Crises? Perceived Resource Scarcity Moderates the Effect of a Common Threat on Intergroup Cooperation

Early Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Relationship Satisfaction and Attributions

Associations between adolescents’ prosocial experiences and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sense of coherence and its components under COVID-19: relative associations with personality and psychosocial variables