How Do Psychology Professors View the Relation Between Scientific Knowledge and Its Applicability and Societal Relevance?

Gijs A. Holleman,Ignace T. C. Hooge,Chantal Kemner,Roy S. Hessels,Gijs A. HollemanIgnace T. C. HoogeChantal KemnerRoy S. Hesselsa Tilburg Universityb Utrecht UniversityGijs A. Holleman is an assistant professor at Cognitive Neuropsychology at Tilburg University. Dr. Holleman investigates the role of eye movements in social interaction,specifically parent-child interactions,and is interested in the history of psychology,and psychology's relevance to society.Ignace T. C. Hooge is an associate professor at Experimental Psychology,Helmholtz Institute,at Utrecht University. Dr. Hooge is an eye-tracking and eye-movement specialist and is involved in both fundamental and applied research.Chantal Kemner is a full professor of biological developmental psychology at Experimental Psychology,Helmholtz Institute at Utrecht University and is director of the YOUth cohort study.Roy S. Hessels is an assistant-professor at Experimental Psychology,Helmholtz Institute,at Utrecht University. Dr. Hessels investigates the role of eye movements in social interaction and is an expert on eye-tracking methodology.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2324311

2024-03-29

The Journal of Psychology

Abstract:How do researchers in psychology view the relation between scientific knowledge, its applicability, and its societal relevance? Most research on psychological science and its benefits to society is discussed from a bird's eye view (a meta-scientific perspective), by identifying general trends such as psychology's dominant focus on lab-based experiments and general descriptive theories. In recent years, several critics have argued that this focus has come at the cost of reduced practical and societal relevance. In this study, we interviewed Dutch psychology professors to gauge their views about the relation between psychological research and its relevance to society. We found that psychology professors engaged in a variety of activities to engage science with society, from work in clinical and applied settings, to consultancy, education, and science communication. However, we found that the role of theory when applying scientific knowledge to practical problems is far from straightforward. While most participants regarded theories as relevant to understanding general contexts of application, psychological theories were seldom directly related to specific applications. We compare and discuss our findings in the light of recent discussions about the lack of applicability and societal relevance of psychological science.

psychology, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the controversies and challenges in the practical application and social relevance of psychological research. Specifically, the author focuses on how psychology professors view the relationship between scientific research and its practical application and social relevance. In recent years, many critics have pointed out that psychological research is overly focused on laboratory experiments and general theories, leading to insufficient contributions to solving real-world problems and social impact. Therefore, this paper explores the following key questions through interviews with psychology professors at Utrecht University in the Netherlands:

1. **How do psychology professors connect their scientific knowledge with practical and social domains?**
- What roles and activities do they engage in to achieve this connection?

2. **How do psychology professors view the relationship between scientific knowledge and its potential applications?**
- Which aspects of scientific knowledge do they believe can be applied to practical fields?

3. **What challenges and obstacles do psychology professors encounter when applying psychological knowledge to practical and social domains?**

4. **How do psychology professors view the changes and demands in the current trends regarding the practical application and social relevance of scientific knowledge?**

Through these questions, the author aims to gain an in-depth understanding from the perspective of individual researchers on their views and experiences in connecting science and society in their daily research practices, thereby supplementing the existing macro perspective (i.e., the meta-scientific research perspective) on the discussion of the practical application and social relevance of psychological research.