Firm-Level and Public-Sector Costs Make Small-Scale Maize Flour Fortification Challenging in Uganda

Stephen Vosti,Emily Baker,Denish Moorthy,Mike Mazinga,Omar Dary
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721231223052
IF: 2.244
2024-01-14
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Abstract:Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Ahead of Print. Background:Maize flour in Uganda is milled by hundreds of enterprises, mostly small- (5-20 metric tons [MT]/day) and micro-scale ( 20 MT/day) and policymakers are considering including smaller-scale millers.Objective:We estimated the private and public costs of maize flour fortification at different scales and explored their implications for extending the mandatory fortification to include smaller-scale mills.Methods:We used secondary data on the structure of the maize flour market and primary data on milling and fortification costs to estimate mill and regulatory costs at 3 scales of flour production: micro, small, and medium.Results:For micro-, small-, and medium-size operations, respectively, operational costs of fortification were US 9, and US 13, US 7 per MT of maize flour, which represented 20%, 16%, and 16% of annual operating costs. Similarly, governmental regulatory costs rose if smaller-scale mills were included because of the increased number of facility inspections required since the current legislation requires mandatory annual inspections. What do the findings mean? Fortification and regulatory costs increase as the scale of production by the millers decreases. If fortification by small- and micro-scale mills were made mandatory, up-front costs of fortification equipment and materials would be daunting for micro- and small-scale millers. Ugandan medium-scale millers might manage fortification costs and other challenges, but only if the social protection programs they supplied were of sufficient volume and regularity.
nutrition & dietetics,food science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?