Abstract:To succeed, democracy building in post-conflict situations requires political parties to be both competent and committed to the democratic rules of the game. Former belligerents tend to dominate. This article investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The analysis focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. The role of international actors in influencing both processes and outcomes in these situations must also be taken into account, especially where democratization is viewed as a means to the end of establishing peace and not simply as goal in its own right. This chapter investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The chapter focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. It explores the influence of internal organizational dynamics on challenges and responses. The chapter looks at the ways in which incentives provided by institutions interact with challenges to party leaders that are posed by the transition from battlefield to political arena. Some political arenas, such as Mozambique, are polarized for historical reasons rooted in the legacy of war and the country's development trajectory.

Party-building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique

Building democracy after war? Post-rebel electoral parties and the construction of stable party systems

Political Elites and Democratic State-building Efforts in Bosnia and Iraq

Political party formation by former armed opposition groups after civil war

Party structures and organization building in Africa

From Formlessness to Structure? The Institutionalization of Competitive Party Systems in Africa

Bilateral vs. Multilateral Peacebuilding in Africa Carrie Manning and Louis-Alexandre Berg

What is to be Done? How Radical Leftists Help to Solve the Problem of Personalist Party-Building in Latin America

Endorsers, challengers or builders? Political parties’ diaspora outreach in a post-conflict state

State-building and patronage networks: how political parties embezzled the bureaucracy in post-war Kosovo

Transitions to democracy, institutional choices and party system stability: lessons from small African islands

Foreign Rebel Sponsorship: A Patron–Client Analysis of Party Viability in Elections Following Negotiated Settlements

Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe

Party Building as Institutional Bricolage: Asserting Authority at the Business Frontier

Lone organizers: Opposition party-building in hostile places in Tanzania

Building Parties’ Grassroots: Electoral Systems, Party Organizations, and Social Linkages from a Cross-National Perspective

Dominant Party Rule, Elections, and Cabinet Instability in African Autocracies

Political Parties in Burundi: Identity and Organizational Cohesion

12. Political parties

Promoting Constitutional Democracy: Regulating Political Parties in the Central African Republic and Senegal