Abstract:To succeed, democracy building in post-conflict situations requires political parties to be both competent and committed to the democratic rules of the game. Former belligerents tend to dominate. This article investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The analysis focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. The role of international actors in influencing both processes and outcomes in these situations must also be taken into account, especially where democratization is viewed as a means to the end of establishing peace and not simply as goal in its own right. This chapter investigates how contextual factors and more particularly the institutional framework in which a party operates affect internal organizational dynamics, and how these in turn affect the challenges that adaptation to democratic politics pose to party leaders. It examines the nested games played by party leaders as they struggle to retain control of their parties and compete with other parties for political power. The chapter focuses on cases drawn from El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique, and shows how inter-party competition shapes the identities, priorities, tactics and strategies, which in turn affect the prospects for democratization. It explores the influence of internal organizational dynamics on challenges and responses. The chapter looks at the ways in which incentives provided by institutions interact with challenges to party leaders that are posed by the transition from battlefield to political arena. Some political arenas, such as Mozambique, are polarized for historical reasons rooted in the legacy of war and the country's development trajectory.

Political Elites and Democratic State-building Efforts in Bosnia and Iraq

Party-building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique

State Building and Transitional Politics in Iraq: The Perils of a Top-down Transition

State-building and patronage networks: how political parties embezzled the bureaucracy in post-war Kosovo

Statebuilding without Nation-building? Legitimacy, State Failure and the Limits of the Institutionalist Approach

Introduction: The Limits of Statebuilding and the Analysis of State-Formation

“Americans Have Taught Us: There Is A Difference Between Democracy and Creating Problems”

Building democracy after war? Post-rebel electoral parties and the construction of stable party systems

Bilateral vs. Multilateral Peacebuilding in Africa Carrie Manning and Louis-Alexandre Berg

Examining the Interface between Bureaucratic Leadership and Nation-building in Africa

Social services to claim legitimacy: comparing autocracies’ performance

Legitimacy and post-conflict state-building: the undervalued role of performance legitimacy

An Ethnic Security Dilemma in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Civic Pride and Civics Education

Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe

What is to be Done? How Radical Leftists Help to Solve the Problem of Personalist Party-Building in Latin America

Ironies of State Building: A Comparative Perspective on the American State

Apparent Strength Conceals Instability in a Model for the Collapse of Historical States

State autonomy, economic reform & business elite influence in the GCC

Explaining institutional change in Nepal and El Salvador: A cultural political economy approach to political settlements analysis

Navigating Consociationalism's Afterlives: Women, Peace and Security in Post-Dayton Bosnia-Herzegovina