Abstract:Abstract Whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurs broadly and repeatedly across the history of eukaryotes and is recognized as a prominent evolutionary force, especially in plants. Immediately following WGD, most genes are present in two copies as paralogs. Due to this redundancy, one copy of a paralog pair commonly undergoes pseudogenization and is eventually lost. When speciation occurs shortly after WGD; however, differential loss of paralogs may lead to spurious phylogenetic inference resulting from the inclusion of pseudoorthologs–paralogous genes mistakenly identified as orthologs because they are present in single copies within each sampled species. The influence and impact of including pseudoorthologs versus true orthologs as a result of gene extinction (or incomplete laboratory sampling) are only recently gaining empirical attention in the phylogenomics community. Moreover, few studies have yet to investigate this phenomenon in an explicit coalescent framework. Here, using mathematical models, numerous simulated data sets, and two newly assembled empirical data sets, we assess the effect of pseudoorthologs on species tree estimation under varying degrees of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and differential gene loss scenarios following WGD. When gene loss occurs along the terminal branches of the species tree, alignment-based (BPP) and gene-tree-based (ASTRAL, MP-EST, and STAR) coalescent methods are adversely affected as the degree of ILS increases. This can be greatly improved by sampling a sufficiently large number of genes. Under the same circumstances, however, concatenation methods consistently estimate incorrect species trees as the number of genes increases. Additionally, pseudoorthologs can greatly mislead species tree inference when gene loss occurs along the internal branches of the species tree. Here, both coalescent and concatenation methods yield inconsistent results. These results underscore the importance of understanding the influence of pseudoorthologs in the phylogenomics era. [Coalescent method; concatenation method; incomplete lineage sorting; pseudoorthologs; single-copy gene; whole-genome duplication.]

Tree2GD: a phylogenomic method to detect large-scale gene duplication events

Locating Large-Scale Gene Duplication Events through Reconciled Trees: Implications for Identifying Ancient Polyploidy Events in Plants

WGDdetector: a Pipeline for Detecting Whole Genome Duplication Events Using the Genome or Transcriptome Annotations

DupLoss-2: Improved Phylogenomic Species Tree Inference under Gene Duplication and Loss

DupScan: Predicting and Visualizing Vertebrate Genome Duplication Database.

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

WGDI: A User-Friendly Toolkit for Evolutionary Analyses of Whole-Genome Duplications and Ancestral Karyotypes

Pervasive Genome Duplications Across the Plant Tree of Life and Their Links to Major Evolutionary Innovations and Transitions

Gene Duplication and Evolution in Recurring Polyploidization–diploidization Cycles in Plants

Phylogenetic Detection of Numerous Gene Duplications Shared by Animals, Fungi and Plants

SLEDGe: Inference of ancient whole genome duplications using machine learning

Widespread Whole Genome Duplications Contribute to Genome Complexity and Species Diversity in Angiosperms.

Synteny-Guided Resolution of Gene Trees Clarifies the Functional Impact of Whole-Genome Duplications

Large-scale Species Tree Estimation

Evolutionary patterns of 64 vertebrate genomes (species) revealed by phylogenomics analysis of protein-coding gene families

Reconciling Multiple Genes Trees via Segmental Duplications and Losses

Species-tree topology impacts the inference of ancient whole-genome duplications across the angiosperm phylogeny

an R/Bioconductor package for the identification, classification, and analysis of gene and genome duplications

Rapid Evolution in a Pair of Recent Duplicate Segments of Rice.

Reconciliation of Gene and Species Trees With Polytomies

Anomaly zones for uniformly sampled gene trees under the gene duplication and loss model