Abstract:Abstract Whole-genome duplication (WGD) occurs broadly and repeatedly across the history of eukaryotes and is recognized as a prominent evolutionary force, especially in plants. Immediately following WGD, most genes are present in two copies as paralogs. Due to this redundancy, one copy of a paralog pair commonly undergoes pseudogenization and is eventually lost. When speciation occurs shortly after WGD; however, differential loss of paralogs may lead to spurious phylogenetic inference resulting from the inclusion of pseudoorthologs–paralogous genes mistakenly identified as orthologs because they are present in single copies within each sampled species. The influence and impact of including pseudoorthologs versus true orthologs as a result of gene extinction (or incomplete laboratory sampling) are only recently gaining empirical attention in the phylogenomics community. Moreover, few studies have yet to investigate this phenomenon in an explicit coalescent framework. Here, using mathematical models, numerous simulated data sets, and two newly assembled empirical data sets, we assess the effect of pseudoorthologs on species tree estimation under varying degrees of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and differential gene loss scenarios following WGD. When gene loss occurs along the terminal branches of the species tree, alignment-based (BPP) and gene-tree-based (ASTRAL, MP-EST, and STAR) coalescent methods are adversely affected as the degree of ILS increases. This can be greatly improved by sampling a sufficiently large number of genes. Under the same circumstances, however, concatenation methods consistently estimate incorrect species trees as the number of genes increases. Additionally, pseudoorthologs can greatly mislead species tree inference when gene loss occurs along the internal branches of the species tree. Here, both coalescent and concatenation methods yield inconsistent results. These results underscore the importance of understanding the influence of pseudoorthologs in the phylogenomics era. [Coalescent method; concatenation method; incomplete lineage sorting; pseudoorthologs; single-copy gene; whole-genome duplication.]

Reconciliation of Gene and Species Trees With Polytomies

Gene tree species tree reconciliation with gene conversion

Efficient Exploration of the Space of Reconciled Gene Trees

Reconciling Multiple Genes Trees via Segmental Duplications and Losses

Gene tree reconciliation including transfers with replacement is hard and FPT

Computing the probability of gene trees concordant with the species tree in the multispecies coalescent

From gene trees to species trees II: Species tree inference in the deep coalescence model

The Inference of Gene Trees with Species Trees

Counting and sampling gene family evolutionary histories in the duplication-loss and duplication-loss-transfer models

Exact reconciliation of undated trees

AleRax: a tool for gene and species tree co-estimation and reconciliation under a probabilistic model of gene duplication, transfer, and loss

Matrix-analytic methods for the evolution of species trees, gene trees, and their reconciliation

Reconstructing protein and gene phylogenies by extending the framework of reconciliation

Reconstruction of time-consistent species trees

Unifying Parsimonious Tree Reconciliation

An Integer Linear Programming Solution for the Domain-Gene-Species Reconciliation Problem

Gene Tree Construction and Correction Using SuperTree and Reconciliation

Reconciling Event-Labeled Gene Trees with MUL-trees and Species Networks

Gene-Tree Reconciliation with MUL-Trees to Resolve Polyploidy Events

Species Tree Estimation and the Impact of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication

reconcILS: A gene tree-species tree reconciliation algorithm that allows for incomplete lineage sorting